Solution :
It is given that :
Amount of investment or the principle amount , P = $ 100
Time of investment , t = 6 years
Rate of interest compounded annually r = 6 %
Therefore the future amount of this investment in a 6 year time is given by,





Therefore, after 6 years the investment of $ 100 will give an amount of $ 141.
Answer:
Prior principal approval must be obtained and a copy of the speech must be retained in your firm's Office of Supervisory Jurisdiction
Explanation:
Because the speech is to be givento 35 attendees, it is under the Retail Communication. Every speech should be honest and of good taste; and the speech must be informational, but far from promotional.
It is not required that the speech content has to be pre-filed with the SEC. A copy must be kept a period of f 3 years for inspection by FINRA examiners. The speech script would be kept on file in the firm's supervisory compliance office that is the Office of Supervisory Jurisdiction.
Answer:
$22.50 per unit
Explanation:
Mark -up is the percentage of cost that is earned as profit.
Using mark-up,
Selling price = Total cost + total profit
Total cot = Fixed cost + variable cost
Total costs = $400,000 + (10× 50,000)
= $900,000
Sales revenue = 125%× 900,000
= 1,125,000
Selling price per unit = Sales revenue/units
=1,125,000/50,000
= $22.50 per unit
Answer: D
Explanation:
Behavioral economics studies the impact of cognitive, psychological, cultural, emotional and social factors on individuals economic decisions. Behavioral economics is concerned with the extent of rationality of individuals, firms and governments. The study includes how market choices are made and the components that propel public choices.
Behavioral economics is important because it gives us an idea about how the mind of humans work. The greater the supply of a particular good, the more we use the good, the less we appreciate it. There are oceans of water and we always get water easily but there are fewer diamonds embedded and hidden in rocks which are not cheap and readily available.
Answer:
Economic integration agreement is when countries within a particular geographical area decide to remove or relax tariff or non-tariff barriers to trade between themselves and also to coordinate and harmonize their fiscal and economic policies. Free trade area is the simplest form of an economic integration; it is when governments of member countries agree to remove trade restriction between each other and when member countries are given the freedom to determine their own external trade policies towards non-members.
Supporters of free trade area argue that it is beneficial to the country based on the trade creation argument. Trade creation is where high-cost domestic production is replaced by more efficiently produced imports from within the group; that is, more expensive domestic products are replaced by lower priced imports from countries within the group. The trade creation argument is hinged on the fact that a free trade area ensures that trade is generated over and above what would otherwise have happened if there was no integration. Further, the removal of tariffs allows members to specialize in those products for which they have a comparative advantage leading to a variety of cheap imports for domestic consumers, thereby increasing living standards or welfare gains. Trade creation also creates an incentive for high cost domestic producers to cut cost so as to remain competitive thereby enhancing efficiency.
On the other hand, a free trade area is criticized on the basis of trade diversion. This is where trade with a low-cost country outside the group is influenced by higher–cost products supplied from within the group; this results in a less efficient allocation of resources as trade from outside the group is replaced by trade from within the group. Trade diversion could mean that local consumers would have to buy products at less competitive prices. Another argument would be that a free trade area would lead to a removal of tariff between member countries thereby resulting in a cessation of government revenue from tariffs. As opposed to a free trade area, free trade would increase world output and employment, raise quality and lower prices of goods as firms have access to factor inputs; it will also increase world living standards or enhances welfare gains. A free trade agreement only restricts these potential advantages to a particular geographical space.
Explanation: