The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
Answer:
hii i have no idea what this is asking
Left and right are the answers, respectively.
Studies have shown that, like humans, dogs may understand words and intonations coming from humans. In recent studies, scientists hypothesize that the left hemisphere of a dog's brain can process and respond to familiar words, while the right hemisphere of the brain will respond to the intonation.
Give me a min to type this answer
I believe the answer is: Symbolic interactionism
Symbolic interactionism refers the social interraction that rely mostly on gestural communication and subjective interpretation.
Sociologist with this view tend to be really curious on how a person subjectively interpret the social interraction that made with other people and how that interpretation could modify that person's behavior.
