Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.
Pilgrims did not have access to any fresh fruits or vegetables that are good sources of vitamin and The men, women, and children aboard the Mayflower had to survive the winter by eating the leftover food from their voyage.
Answer:
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C) is allowed to make rules and laws which are technically unconstitutional." Chile, Peru, and Venezuela are each considered unitary governments. A main characteristic of a unitary government is that it is allowed to make rules and laws which are technically unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Answer:
A patch quilt (individual parts might be valued as much as the quilt as a whole)
Explanation:
Explanation:
American Indians in different parts of the land developed a variety of economies based on their locations. WHAT evidence from the text supports this statement? American Indians in the Missouri River valley grew gardens and hunted bison, while peoples in the Pacific Northwest supported themselves by fishing salmon.
