1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lerok [7]
3 years ago
6

In general, citizens really liked the Articles Of Confederation and felt that it was a good type of Government.

History
2 answers:
faltersainse [42]3 years ago
6 0
False it is definitely false
Alex777 [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The people didn't like the Articles of Confederation because it was too weak. While the monarchy the people had been under was too controlling, the Articles of Confederation was too much on the other side of it, being too lenient and barely having the power to do anything.

You might be interested in
How did the US government grow/get more power during ww1?
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

centralization.

Explanation:

Centralization is one of the methods used to increase a government's power during a war period. The others include increased military and internal enforcement spending and propaganda to shape the message reaching the masses.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help pls im timed ://
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

Option B: The U.S was destined to expand westward and spread civilization.

Explanation:

Using the system of trial-and-error, you know that options C and D aren't the correct answers to the question, as the quote says nothing about land, nor about Native American tribes.

For the remaining two choices, Turner said nothing about the Americans becoming weaker with Western life – nor did he even mention any hardships! And so, with the three choices cancelled out, option B seems to be the best answer to this question.

5 0
3 years ago
Justices for the Supreme Court are:
frutty [35]
It is D, they are nominated by the president
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was it about the NAACP that Randolph disagreed with
Oksana_A [137]
<span>Basically, many civil rights leaders felt the NAACP was an institution devoted not to expanding civil rights for all African Americans, but promoting the economic privileges of a small, black middle class. As I recall from my Twentieth Century Black Militancy class in university, for a long time the NAACP never pursued litigation to advance social justice for all blacks. It was perceived as an organization that was content to advance a certain amount of economic progress within the larger white power frame and without trying to change the existing white power structure, which was dominated by segregation and jim crow. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between a monarch and capitalist
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

The only difference would be governor of the state is hereditary not democratic, but the inherent contradictions in the capitalist production

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the spanish explore and colonize new mexico and Florida in the 1600's?
    11·1 answer
  • Which circumstances would a smarter power grid help resolve?
    15·1 answer
  • The end of the feudal systems that defi ned the European Middle Ages was
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these examples of colonial literature was written as part of the Great Awakening?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Allies win World War I?
    8·1 answer
  • What did The Europeans hope to gain by finding a sea route to asia
    6·2 answers
  • Lincoln's attitude toward slavery was _____. that it should be kept below the missouri compromise line to the pacific that he di
    7·2 answers
  • Who was putting pressure on Abraham Lincoln to make the US Civil War about emancipation?
    7·1 answer
  • What issues divided Americans in the 20s ?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the American Revolution affect women?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!