The presidential system selects a head of government independently of the legislature, while in contrast, the head of government in a parliamentary system answers directly to the legislature. Presidential systems necessarily operate under the regulations of separation of powers, while parliamentary methods do not.
<h3>What is the presidential state of government give an example?</h3>
A presidential system is a method of government where a head of government is also head of state and shows an executive branch that is different from the legislative branch. The United States, for instance, has a presidential system.
<h3>What is the difference of parliamentary and presidential?</h3>
In a parliamentary form of government, the powers are divided between the little head and the real head of the state. In a presidential form of government on the other hand the forces are concentrated in the hands of the single executive or the President of the nation.
To learn more about presidential system, refer
brainly.com/question/15453662
#SPJ9
Whats question your asking
Answer:
The Battle of Plassey (1757) was a defining moment in Indian history. The Battle of Plassey was fought between the British East India Company and the Nawab of Bengal and his close supporters, most of whom were French forces.
Answer:
revolutionary movement (or revolutionary social movement) is a specific type of social movement dedicated to carrying out a revolution. Charles Tilly defines it as "a social movement advancing exclusive competing claims to control of the state, or some segment of it".[1] Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper define it more simply (and consistently with other works[2][need quotation to verify]) as "a social movement that seeks, as minimum, to overthrow the government or state".[3]
A social movement may want to make various reforms and to gain some control of the state, but as long as they do not aim for an exclusive control, its members are not revolutionary.[4] Social movements may become more radical and revolutionary, or vice versa - revolutionary movements can scale down their demands and agree to share powers with others, becoming a run-of-the-mill political party.[4]
The correct answer is - The God Huitzilopotchli desired more blood from human sacrifice.
The Aztecs were very fond of performing sacrifices towards their Gods, especially to the God of war, Huitzilopotchli. They were making human sacrifices on a regular basis for him as he was a God that was very blood thirsty. Most of the people that were sacrificed were people from the other tribes that they were ruling over, but also there were lots of Aztecs that were sacrificed. While the other people did not wanted to be sacrificed, the Aztecs considered it as an honor to be sacrificed to their God, so lots of them were volunteering for sacrifice.
