The modern period can be counted from around 1500 AD.
Most of the missionary work in this time, especially in the early years, was violent and directly connected to colonialism. For example, the missionaries in Mexico did not initially agree that the pagans had souls and were not protecting them from violence from the state. A lot of missionary work (in Mexico too) was state-sponsored and state-imposed, as the colonial powers saw it as increasing their status among other countries.
Answer:
The khan was the ruler of the Mongolian Empire. That's why the rulers of Mongolia all had khan after their name (Genghis Khan, Kublai Khan etc.). A farmer would've been a "fyermyer", a priest would've been a "tackhilch" and a soldier would've been a "tsereg". The actually way to say king would've been "khaan" (pronounced xan) not khan.
<span>The correct answer is A. Both exercised military and economic domination over colonial territories.
Both French and British practised similar tactics to control and domination over their empires in Asia to profit economically and militarily from their colonies. Economically the French did well in Fur Trade while the British sold products to their colonies and acquired raw materials for their industries, getting products from their farms.
Both countries also used their colonial territories in Asia to serve as military bases when necessary.</span>
