I think the answer is B. I hope it helps! :)
It is about Gordon korman using the item as the next future item in the case of the continuing investigation. The protagonist says the character of the secretary is the only territory of the England in the northwest. Therefore the protagonist is saying that Gordon is using the future time telling as the next best item. Good luck :)
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The exchange of words between mitty and the parking lot attendant shows that Mitty is uninformed about how to park the car. </em>
<em>A. Uninformed</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Mitty’s insolent skill is showcased in handling the car. The parking lot attendant removes the tire chain of Mitty car and gives a grin. Mitty’s reaction was grouped together and he was unknown the skill of parking the car. Mitty reacts in the way that he avoids the plan to feel embarrassed in future while parking the cars.
1. We can infer from the details of the passage that true or romantic love is more complex than lust because: it's more complex because we have no control over it and it is permanent.
2. The inferences that one can make about the types of subjects she has studied in addition to psychology is that she has studied "Philosophy".
<h3>What is inference?</h3>
Inference refers to the conclusion that one arrives as a result of observation and evaluation. Inference tends to be the final conclusion of an experimentation.
Sentence Frames:
1. In paragraph 2, the physicist Jim Al-Khalili states that lust is "is a
temporary passionate s**ual desire" and that it increases the release of a few chemicals in the body. On the other hand, true love "love is a powerful neurological condition like hunger or thirst, only more permanent" and is a condition he describes as "<u>permanent</u>" which shows that true love is more complex than lust.
In paragraph 3, the psychotherapist Philippa Perry refers to "love". In paragraph 4, she mentions "Aristotle" and lists "the philosophical saying of Aristotle".
Therefore, I can infer that Perry has studied "Philosophy".
3. In paragraph 7, the romantic novelist Jojo Moyes explains that love can be like "an obsession" and be "all consuming" so I can infer she is likely to include characters who were obsessed by love. Moyes also says that what "fascinates" her is "what separates love." Therefore, I can infer the plots of her books probably contain the incidences that led to separation of love.
Learn more about types of love on brainly.com/question/21491281
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. Apollo promises he will give his son any gift but that of allowing him to drive the chariot.
2. Apollo tells his son that not even other gods can drive his chariot.
3. Apollo explains what will happen if his son drives his chariot.
4. Apollo reluctantly gives in to his son's request to drive the chariot.
Explanation:
When Phaethon went to his father the sun god- Apollo, to confirm his legitimacy, his father assured him that he was indeed his son. Awed by his father's magnificence and the sun-chariot, Phaethon made a request to drive the chariot when told by his father to make any request. Phaethon insisted on driving the chariot and since his father already gave his word, he could not go back on it.
Apollo initially resisted the idea and told his son to make another request. He explained that not even other gods like zeus could drive his chariot. He explained how the chariot worked and the dangers involved in it. When his son refused still insisted, he eventually had to keep his word by letting his son drive the chariot.
