The option that identifies why Luke is told that he could not help analyze the results of the census in order to better understand the thinking and problems facing society is the following option: The census data does not address society's problems. Luke as a psychologist has the ability to analyze the different aspects of the human being in society, especially related to their behavior and ways of thinking. However, the results of the census contain data on the families' socioeconomic level, number of members, etc., but not issues related to thoughts or problems.
Answer:
The Nazi leaders envisioned killing 11 million Jews as part of the “Final Solution.” They succeeded in murdering 6 million. The Nazis frequently used euphemistic language to disguise the true nature of their crimes. They used the term “Final Solution” to refer to their plan to annihilate the Jewish people.
Explanation:
Answer:
Great effect.
Explanation:
Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case has a great affect on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties because this case avoid the civil rights and civil liberties of the Cakeshop who denied of giving cake for the wedding of gay couple due to he thought that it is a religious discrimination. The Cakeshop has the civil rights and civil liberties whether provide its services to a person or not. The Supreme court decision is right as compared to commission's decision that provides civil rights and civil liberties to the Cakeshop.
Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
