The one on the right is answered in a PM. It is C. It is informal and quietly observant about what happened in Montreal some years ago. There is nothing formal, didactic (there is no teaching going on and there is no moral instruction -- not yet anyway). There is no formal introduction (thesis statement). He is just talking about a setting. This is an interlude before getting to the point; you could argue that the very first sentence is a thesis statement, but after that we are getting something pretty conversational. I'd pick C.
Bonus
A very quick answer to the first one. I believe the answer is "Their only interest is in a one way international law ... It is what the dictators are doing and what their ultimate aim is. Being able to come to that conclusion is a job for logos. The sentences preceding it show the method used by the dictators in war or the response of America should a dictator invade a democracy. It is not exactly logos. The United States is very emotional in the use of the word democracy. The sworn enemy of a democracy is a dictator. Answer The sentence beginning "Their only interest ...
