Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
As we know the agriculture of a place is very influenced by the environmental and geological factors that make up that place. As a result, some foods can be grown in one region, but they cannot be grown in another, which greatly changes the food and diet of the inhabitants in each location. Thus, a historian may need to study what foods were grown in a given region so that he can establish what the eating habits of the residents of that region were like.
An example of this can be seen with a historian who wants to study the food of Native American peoples. This historian may discover that while the apple was easily grown and served as food for the natives of North America, it could not be cultivated in South America, due to environmental factors, saying that the natives of South America did not have the apple in their diets.
That statement is true
In most cases, the punishment that imposed by the court would be in equal values of the damage that the defendant caused to the accuser, ( could be in the form of fine, jail time, or forced settlement)
But, in some cases, the crime that conducted by the defendant is too extreme and outrageous to the point where the court wants to punish the defendant with harsher punishment in order to set up an example for the public so no other civilians will repeat such crime.
They could be overpowered by powerful lords, who are trying to overthrow the emperor. They could be falsely accused of not being related.