The engraving of the Boston Massacre, created by Paul Revere, shows the Boston Massacre as an incident when the British military opens up fire on a group of unarmed colonists. In this engraving, it appears that the colonists are peaceful and that the attack is unprovoked.
However, what the engraving does not show, is the fact that this started due to American colonists protesting and throwing objects at the British military trying to maintain order.
Paul Revere exaggerates what the Boston Massacre looked like in order to persuade colonists that the British military was tyrannical. This would be used as a piece of propaganda to persuade some colonists to join the independence movement that was gaining momentum at this time.
Here they are, in his own words:
Selling indulgences to finance the building of St. Peter's is wrong. ...
The pope has no power over Purgatory. "Papal indulgences do not remove guilt. ...
Buying indulgences gives people a false sense of security and endangers their salvation.
Sugar Act. First meant to raise colonial money for the crown.
Currency Act. Prevented colonists from issuing their own currency.
Quartering Act. The colonists are forced to provide barracks and supplies to British troops.
Stamp Act. The British began taxing newspapers, almanacs, pamphlets, broadsides, legal documents, dice, and playing cards. The "stamp" was to signify a priorly mentioned product's tax was paid.
Answer:Organize your information and focus on each feature before moving onto the text – it is not ideal to discuss color and jump from line to then in the conclusion discuss color again. First summarize the overall appearance of the work of art – is this a painting? Does the artist use only dark colors? Why heavy brushstrokes? etc and then discuss details of the object – this specific animal is gray, the sky is missing a moon, etc. Again, it is best to be organized and focused in your writing – if you discuss the animals and then the individuals and go back to the animals you run the risk of making your writing unorganized and hard to read. It is also ideal to discuss the focal of the piece – what is in the center? What stands out the most in the piece or takes up most of the composition?
Explanation:
Answer:
I hope this helps
Explanation:
- Who were they?: Sacco and Vanzetti were Italian anarchists immigrants who had been debatably accused of murdering a paymaster and a guard during a armed robbery of the Slater and Morrill Shoe company in South Braintree, Massachusetts, United States. They were accused of murdering a gaurd and a paymaster on April 15th during the 1920s.
- What happaned to them : they has been executed for the murderes
- Why did it happen? : I believe it happened because the two were framed for the crimes because they were anarchist and pro-union activites.
