1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goblinko [34]
3 years ago
5

How did the new deal change American political thinking

History
1 answer:
lukranit [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

federal government should attempt to solve social and economical problems

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What was the main accomplishment of the Freedmen's Bureau?
egoroff_w [7]
I believe it would be the food rations it deployed.
8 0
3 years ago
Why do people support the Right to Bear Arms amendment?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Explanation:Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects a private right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.

Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign adversaries. For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.

The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense. The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.

This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry. They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could adequately deter federal oppression.

The Second Amendment conceded nothing to the Anti-Federalists’ desire to sharply curtail the military power of the federal government, which would have required substantial changes in the original Constitution. Yet the Amendment was easily accepted because of widespread agreement that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms, any more than it should have the power to abridge the freedom of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Much has changed since 1791. The traditional militia fell into desuetude, and state-based militia organizations were eventually incorporated into the federal military structure. The nation’s military establishment has become enormously more powerful than eighteenth century armies. We still hear political rhetoric about federal tyranny, but most Americans do not fear the nation’s armed forces and virtually no one thinks that an armed populace could defeat those forces in battle. Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for civilian uses. Civilians no longer expect to use their household weapons for militia duty, although they still keep and bear arms to defend against common criminals (as well as for hunting and other forms of recreation).

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast Teamwork Skills and leaderships skills​
AURORKA [14]

Answer:

Leaders establish goals, while teamwork involves adopting those goals and sharing the objectives as a shared agenda. Leaders who practice participative management often prefer to set objectives in collaboration with their team.

3 0
3 years ago
How did ayran culture explain the use of caste System
vichka [17]

Answer:

Aryans from central Asia invaded South Asia and introduced the caste system as a means of controlling the local populations.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A ____ was an area of a city where Jews were segregated during the holocaust.
BaLLatris [955]

A Ghetto,  was the location were Jews during the WW2 were marginated, as the expression of an anti-semitic racial policy of Adolf Hitler that became institutionalized.

Most of the Ghettos were established all over Germany, Poland, parts of France. There the conditions for a living were extremely bad: they lacked the most essential things for a living. Many didn't have good energy and water supply. The security of the neighborhood is also compromised. Many unrest can happen and there is little to be done as authorities will not care. As leaving a Ghetto was illegal, the people escaping them were systematically executed.

Perhaps the most representative Ghetto is the nowadays Warsaw Ghetto, that serves as museum and memorial for Nazi crimes against humanity. This Ghetto once had almost half a million people living on it.

Below you can see how many Ghettos  mostly in East Europe were later transformed into Death Camps:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help me asap i really need help.
    7·1 answer
  • A key difference between the indigenous peoples of North America and those of South America was
    11·1 answer
  • What did Zacharias say John would do? Use complete sentences.
    13·1 answer
  • How are the pilgrims different settlers than earlier ones?
    13·1 answer
  • Don’t lie what is the answer
    13·1 answer
  • Use the quotation and your knowledge of social studies to answer the following question.
    15·2 answers
  • The length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is 16 inches. If the length of one leg is 5 inches, what is the approximate len
    15·1 answer
  • From 1910 to 2010, what contributed to the increase in Georgia's urban population? Check all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • In battles in the Philippines and Puerto Rico, American forces were joined by:
    14·1 answer
  • What makes "Spiritual Life and Moral Codes" a key theme in studying history?​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!