Guam is technically part of the U.S, so it would be English and the other group is Polynesian.
Answer:The Civil Rights Movement vs. The Black Liberation MovementOn The Duty of Civil Disobedience, written by Henry David Thoreau, explains that civil disobedience is the act of standing for your beliefs even though they are against the law. Thoreau goes on to say that the government (because it is ruled by the majority) is not always right for everyone especially the individual and the minority. Over the course of American history, there have been many different groups formed for the purpose of civil disobedience. The two that I am going to focus on are the activists of the Civil Rights Movement and the Black Panthers of the Black Liberation Movement. The Civil Rights Movement began in 1954 with the case of Brown vs. the Board of Education. It was basically lead by Martin Luther King Jr. whose teachings were of peaceful protesting and boycotting in order to achieve the goals of integration and equality for Black Americans (Small). The Black Liberation Movement started a few years later in 1960 and was later taken over and popularized by the Black Panthers in 1966. The basis of this movement was not just black equality but also black independence by any and every means necessary. The Panthers wanted blacks to be in control of their own neighborhoods (Acoli). These two protest movements had similar but at the same time very different platforms. The difference their effectiveness was caused by the difference in the techniques. The similarities in the two programs would be the things that they did for the community. Even though the Panthers were more violent in their ways they still had a positive message to send out. Both the Civil Rights movement and the Black Liberation Page 2movement were meant to uplift the black people in America. They were both very community based, but they just felt differently about the techniques needed to help their people (
Explanation:
Answer:
Interaction between Native Americans—the people Columbus called “Indians”–and other Americans, has taken place in every period of American history. Although white people—especially the early colonists—accepted much from the natives, they rarely considered Indians their equals. In the second half of the 19th century, conflict
between whites and natives was at its worst.
In this part you’ll investigate the question: How did interaction with other Americans
affect Native American societies?
Investigation: Plains Tribal Culture
When societies with differing cultures come in contact, differing ways of acting and thinking often cause problems. A society that believes each tree holds the spirit of an ancestor is likely to take a dim view of a logging crew. A society that lives by exact “clock time” may have problems interacting with another group that uses more relaxed “sun time.”
The cultures—the ideas and ways of acting—of the Native American tribes were not all alike. Nevertheless, many tribes were similar. Those living in the Great Plains (Cheyenne, Sioux, and Comanche, for example) shared many ideas and ways of acting, as did those in the Rocky Mountains. All reacted similarly when pioneers moved into their territory in the second half of the 1800s.
