Cleaning up a park, free car wash, volunteer at the soup kitchen
Answer:
2. Credit equipment $100,000
3. Debit accumulated depreciation $60,000
Explanation:
When a company trades with another pieces of equipment gain or losses are recognized when there is commercia lsubstance. If not, then the trade-in equipment is posted as the net book value of the old equipment
In both cases, the old equipment is write-off thus:
credit equipment for 100,000
and debit accumualted overhead for 60,000
Now, we look at the option that matches this. The information about the new assets is insuficient as we aren't given information about whether or not thre is commercial substance
Answer:
Conversion costs= $488,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
depreciation expense - factory building, $133,000
direct labor, $250,000
factory utilities, $105,000
<u>The conversion costs are the sum of direct labor and manufacturing overhead.</u>
<u></u>
Manufacturing overhead= 133,000 + 105,000= 238,000
Direct labor= 250,000
Conversion costs= $488,000
Answer:
The basic principle is known as the opportunity cost
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is defined as something that you are not earning because you don't do a revenue activity.
In this case, Sharon doesn't receive $9 per each hour that she prefers to go to the swimming pool. Also, she is expending $4 additional to the opportunity cost each time that she goes to swim.
<em>For example, if she goes to swim 2 hours a day instead of work them, we can conclude that she isn't earning $18 and lossing $4 additional for the fee entrance to the swimming pool. </em>
<em />
Please, note that, are different the concepts of "let of earning" and "lossing". First one talks about money that you never have had and the second is about money that you had but now you don't.
Answer:
The options are missing:
- File the return since you know that Mary has done them a favor by allowing them to move in.
-
Explain the residency requirement and file the return showing the grandson lived with Mary for more than half the year.
-
File the return, but only after Mary assures you that Sheila will not be claiming her son.
-
Explain to Mary that she is not eligible to claim her grandson, and that you cannot knowingly file an incorrect tax return.
My answer would be:
4. Explain to Mary that she is not eligible to claim her grandson, and that you cannot knowingly file an incorrect tax return.
Explanation:
This is both a legal and ethical question.
Legally, Mary is not allowed to deduct Heila's son as her dependent because she only lived with her for 5 months and the minimum requirement is 6 months.
Ethically, you are asked to benefit someone that is your friend (or might not), but in order to do so you must break the law. Is it ethical to break the law in order to benefit an specific person? The answer is no, the law should be the same for everyone. To be honest, no one will probably even realize that you did something illegal, but bad actions always have consequences and we do not always realize them.
