Answer:
D. $ 10,300
Choice D is correct: Net income = $ 10,300
Explanation:
Cash Received = $ 16000
Less Rent Paid= ( $ 2000)
Add income = $ 3000
Less Salaries for the month of March = ($ 6200)
Less utilities paid ($ <u>500)</u>
<u>Net income=</u> $ 10,300
Treatments.
Net income is found by deducting expenses from revenues earned
$ 100,000 is the retained earnings so it is not accounted for net income.
Equipment is an asset so it is not accounted for net income.
Cash received is the revenue so it is accounted.
Rent is an expense account so it is subtracted.
Income for service $ 3000 provided is also taken into account on matching principle basis.
Advance received will be adjusted when the services will be rendered on matching principle.
Answer:
Correct answer is D. All future costs, both variable and fixed
Explanation:
In target costing, all future costs both variable and fixed costs are relevant. This is for us to clearly determine the desired profit that the company wants to attain. The process of costing is to determine all future costs that the company will possibly incur in the production and add it to the desired profit margin to know the unit sales price of the product.
Answer:
B) must be balanced by a statement that trading options can also result in significant losses.
Explanation:
Representatives do not trade securities by themselves, they only enter orders on behalf of their clients and following their clients' orders. That means that the clients assume the risk of losing money due to a bad investment. The clients are also the ones that benefit the most since it is their money being invested. Any statement that states the possibility of significant earnings, must also include the possibility of significant losses.
Answer:
The answer is: True
Explanation:
First of all, the classical dichotomy in economics assumes that real variables of the economy such as output of goods and services and real interest rates are not influenced by what happens to their nominal counterparts, such as the monetary value of output and nominal interest rate. It doesn´t consider inflation or the nominal supply, in other words money supply is neutral in the economy (because its value is adjusted to inflation).
The real problem with this theory, at least in the short run, is that in real life money supply, interest rates and inflation do affect the GDP of a country. When the money supply of an economy is increased then aggregate demand also increases. More money equals more demand. That happens because the prices of goods and services doesn´t adjust as fast as a change in the money supply. Also this theory doesn´t consider the monetary circuit theory about money being "created" by the banking system every time a loan is made.
<span>a. not counted as part of the labor force</span>
