Answer:
In 1638 Anne Hutchinson was kicked out of Boston for “antinomianism.”
So Anne Hutchinson’s view says good character is not necessary for salvation. This is to be “anti-nonmain” — “against law.” The opposite is to make law central — “legalism.” Legalism goes the opposite way and says good character is what is necessary for salvation. But then how good do you have to be? Is anyone really good enough? Can anyone conform to law enough? Perhaps not. No one is perfect. People have weaknesses, secret needs and habits. So we may need some “antinomianism.” If you aren’t good enough but get the benefit anyway, that’s called forgiveness. It seems like forgiveness must be required to go to heaven. Forgiveness negates the necessity of the law. It says you didn’t follow the law properly but it’s okay. If in reality we’re all a bunch of greedy , then we might need a bit of antinomianism to go to heaven. This fundamental problem of Christian religion goes all the way back to the founding and continues today. It’s an inherent logical problem of Christian faith.
Explanation:
b, a wouldn't make sense because in history in general people have tended to like meritocracy over aristocracy. C and D don't make sense because aristocracy doesn't include how hard a person works for a job
USSR began building missile sites in Cuba in 1962.
There was a coup in Cuba in '59. The new government did not like the United States and took over some American businesses.
The missle sites could hit any city in the USA.
American ships blocked Soviet ships carrying misses into Cuba. The Soviets and Cubans agreed to take away the missiles if America promised not to attack Cuba.
Technically, nobody won. Although, the USSR lost China's support after.
Source: https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-some-cause-effects-cuban-missile-crisis-508792
You didn’t list any accounts, but I can provide some examples.
The automatic incorrect answers are American accounts and Japanese accounts are those are both the receivers and attacker’s.
Their allies in the war also might not be as well as they can be biased towards their ally.
However, neutral countries could be very unbiased as they have no allies and were not involved.
Hope this helps!
