Answer:
B) plan 1 : worker earning y = x - 0.14 , unit labor = 
plan 2 : worker earning y = 0.5x + 0.5, unit labor = (0.5x + 0.5) / x
C) At 128%
D ) plan D IS PREFERABLE
Explanation:
In the first case Benefits are split : 30% to worker , 70% to company ( up to 120% ) performance
In the second case benefits 50% go to the worker and 50% go the company
B) The equations for worker earnings and normalized unit labor costs for each scheme
Plan 1 :
y ( percentage earning of worker ) = 1
unit labor cost = Y / 1
y = 0 - 30
unit labor = 0.3 / x
y = x - 0.14 therefore unit labor =
plan 2 :
y ( percentage earning of worker ) = 1, y = 0.5x + 0.5
unit labor cost : Y / 1 = (0.5x + 0.5) / x
C ) The point at which the two plans break even
0.5x + 0.5 = x - 0.14
0.5 + 0.14 = x - 0.5x
0.64 = x(1 - 0.5 )
x = 0.64 / 0.5 = 1.28 = 128%
D) The company would prefer plan 1
Answer: b. mind games and your money
Explanation:
This falls under Mental accounting where our minds play games with our money by dividing them into various accounts and uses based on our emotions.
Sunk costs play a big part in this because we get so attached to the accounts we have put a lot of effort in while neglecting those we have not or do not want to think about. Maria here is proud of her savings account so much so that she does not see the detrimental effect of not paying off the credit card debt which is rising rapidly.
Her savings account is now a sunk cost and she doesn't realize. This principle can help advise her so she understands the games her mind is playing on her and fix it before the damage gets worse.
Answer:
Fannie Mae would argue that "to the order of" is a complete order instrument that needs endorsement and can be enforced. "Pay to the order of" are negotiable instruments that must be paid via endorsement and delivery.
Explanation:
The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) wanted to foreclose on the house and sell it to recover the balance due. Smith argued that the words "to the order of " in the endorsement made the note an incomplete order instrument and that Fannie Mae could not enforce it. What is Fannie Mae's best response to this argument
Smith argued, among other things, that the indorsement on the note rendered it incomplete and "insufficient to support the use of executory process and,the words "to the order of [blank]" included in the subject indorsement made the instrument incomplete order paper, not bearer paper, and thus Fannie Mae could not properly enforce the note.However,Fannie Mae would argue that "to the order of" is a complete order instrument that needs endorsement and can be enforced. "Pay to the order of" are negotiable instruments that must be paid via endorsement and delivery.
Answer:
b. maximum amount of output that can be produced given the labor force, capital stock, and technology.
Explanation:
GDP refers to the gross domestic product which reflects the finalized value of the goods and services produced domestically
On the other side, the potential GDP refers to the maximum level of output that can be produced by considering the labor force, capital stock, technology by taking the constant inflation rate
Therefore option b is correct
