Thane Rosenbaum open his essay with examples from France and Israel because the issue under discussion (Neo-Nazis, free speech) is prevalent in those two locations.
<h3>How is France in terms of free speech laws different from United States?</h3>
The Freedom of expression is one that was said to be included in the Declaration of the Rights. But the freedom of speech in France is known to have its limitations.
The limitations centered around racism, anti-Semitism, racial hatred, and others. While in the U.S., people do have freedom of speech, religion, press, and others.
Learn more about Thane Rosenbaum from
brainly.com/question/26754646
Renaissance was primarily affected by Christianity and it was the main religion during that time.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Renaissance was a period in the history of Europe. This was a period which saw the transition and changing of medieval period to the period of modernity. It was a period of the fifteenth century and the sixteenth century in the history.
Renaissance was mostly and primarily influenced by the Christianity. The main religion of Renaissance was Christianity and the movement of Renaissance combined nature of humanity with the faith in Christianity.
Answer:
The United States should increase domestic manufacturing to promote prosperity.
Explanation:
Excerpt:
“The creation of a home market is not only necessary to procure for our agriculture a just reward of its labors, but it is indispensable to obtain a supply of our necessary wants. . . . Suppose no actual abandonment of farming, but, what is most likely, a gradual and imperceptible employment of population in the business of manufacturing, instead of being compelled to resort to agriculture. . . . Is any part of our common country likely to be injured by a transfer of the theatre of [manufacturing] for our own consumption from Europe to America?
“. . . Suppose it were even true that Great Britain had abolished all restrictions upon trade, and allowed the freest introduction of the [products] of foreign labor, would that prove it unwise for us to adopt the protecting system? The object of protection is the establishment and perfection of the [manufacturing] arts. In England it, has accomplished its purpose, fulfilled its end. . . . The adoption of the restrictive system, on the part of the United States, by excluding the [products] of foreign labor, would extend the [purchasing] of American [products], unable, in the infancy and unprotected state of the arts, to sustain a competition with foreign fabrics. Let our arts breathe under the shade of protection; let them be perfected as they are in England, and [then] we shall be ready . . . to put aside protection, and enter upon the freest exchanges.”
Henry Clay, speaker of the House of Representatives, speech in Congress, 1824