The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
Answer:
The Constitution needs to do more to protect individual rights.
Explanation:
The name was Domino Theroy
Answer: In a sense they were snobbish, the only reason for colonization was gold and to spread their faith to the Native Americans. In the attempt to do that most thought of the natives as savage and nonhuman. They believed themselves as the predominant race and the owners of the land the natives lived on. Many were greedy and only thought of what they could gain without thinking of the consequences of their actions.
Explanation: millions of Native Americans died not only from the diseases that were brought over but from the force labor and conquest of the conquistadors.
French and Americans were battling the Brits and their supply was also cut off. <span />
