Answer: .The correct answer is a). the case is being heard for the first time.
Explanation: A court has original jurisdiction over a case when a case is being heard for the first time.
This cases are heard directly without any intermediary or appellate review.
Answer:
E. Reports how equity changes over a period of time.
Explanation:
Statement of owner's equity as the name suggests is the statement which describes the changes in owner's equity, as it is obvious that the change cannot occur at a point of time, it will occur over a period of time.
And therefore, the statement is prepared over a period generally for a fiscal year, or a financial year.
There is no statement prepared to show any change in owner's equity at a point.
Statement reporting cash flows is called cash flow statement.
Therefore, correct option is:
Statement E
Answer:
<u>PetSmart</u> is an example of a speciality store.
Explanation:
It sells stuff only related to pets, unlike the other stores mentioned.
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
Answer:
lack of anonymity
Explanation:
According to my research on whistle-blowing systems within organizations, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the major issue that the program seems to have is a lack of anonymity. All whistle-blower systems are designed to be completely anonymous so that anyone who uses the system to do the right thing and report people who are breaking the law or rules are not mentioned and face backlash from co-workers. Apparently, the system that Company X is either not anonymous or is not adhering to the anonymity policy.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
