Answer:
reliable, diligent, responsible, zealous, ambitious, punctual, generous, caring, and humble
Explanation: These words all have positive connotations, meaning they would be good qualities for someone to have. The others, which I did not mention, are negative qualities.
Answer: the answer is vile
Explanation: because pathos appeals to the reader and it has to deal with emotion and feelings
hope this is helpful text me if you need more information
Answer:
<em>Be cautious using emotional appeals. They have no place in an academic argument if their purpose-as often seen in advertising and politics-is to deceive or distort.</em>
Explanation:
<em>Emotional appeal can be accomplished in a multitude of ways:</em>
<em>By a metaphor or storytelling, common as a hook.</em>
<em>By a general passion in the delivery.</em>
<em>By an overall emotion.</em>
<em>By the sympathies of the speech or writing as determined by the audience.</em>
Answer:
The correct option is D (The interview provides first hand insight into marshals strengths and motivations while the information does not .)
Explanation:
The instructive content is the reason for the contentions in the meeting. "Equal with Justice Under Law" applies to everybody paying little respect to race and shading. In the meeting, the court case that was referred to was an unmistakable grandstand of correspondence and equity.
The educational content gives certainties and insights concerning Thur-good Marshall, while the meeting presents bits of knowledge into Marshall's contemplation's and inspirations.
By the way can you vote me brainlyest?