Google overcame its competitors because the developers knew how to market and knew how to make a product that consumers wanted. In the early days of the internet, search engines where filled with adds, links, tools like calculators and calendars. While having links to Facebook or Reddit, and having the calculators and calendars seemed helpful, it crowded the page. Those search engines had too much going on to the point it became unhelpful. Google understood that people wanted a search engine that had its purpose and did it well. It's simple, does it's job, and it doesn't overwhelm the consumer when they want to look something up.
Think of it this way, if you're trying to look up a recipe, do you want to go to the page that had 20+ other links and flashy colors and pop up adds, or a simple search bar that will take you right where you need to go with no distractions?
Are very different from each other
<span>The most probable answer to this problem would be all literary theories that has existed since then are still acceptable to use in literary analysis. The thing is, the utilization of these theories for literary analysis are close to little to none. Literary theories, literally, bloomed in usage from 1960s through 1980s to the point that the practitioners and the people related to this made actions to the extent of including it to the academies' curricula. As of the modern times, it declined until it died out. This doesn't mean that the usage is prohibited anymore, it is just that its popularity has died out since then.</span>
Explanation:
Possibly you could say something around the lines of:
"Now my question to you is this: is blah worth blah?"
would you have done blah to get blah?"
when we see blah / when blah happens,
are we doing blah/saying blah thinking blah?"
I won't just give you a question, but I will tell you that the reason this is present is to make sure that the audience will continue considering whatever idea you have presented them with a while after you present it. It required their minds to engage with your topic. It provides you with an opportunity to guide the audience on what you want them to consider after having heard your point.
The fourth one is the one that best describes the paragraph.
