Three major differences between anti-Catholic sentiment and anti-Mormon sentiment.

2 answers:

8 0

Anti-Catholicism is hostility towards or opposition to the Catholic Church, its clergy and adherents.Catholics in Protestant countries were frequently suspected of conspiring against the state in furtherance of papal interests. Anti-Mormonism is discrimination, persecution, hostility or prejudice directed at members of the Latter Day Saint movement, particularly The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

kondor19780726 [428]3 years ago

5 0

A Mormon chief was slaughtered by the individuals who didn't share the Mormon faith, however no Catholic religious leaders were executed.

Catholics dealt with segregation when they were migrating because of local nativism, while those who were hostile to Mormon had different reasons.

Anti-Mormon discrimination incorporated a compulsory relocation, while those hostile to Catholics didn't go that far.

You might be interested in

What is the connection between ratification and the Bill of Rights?

777dan777 [17]

Answer:

it should be D. or B hope im right good luck

4 0

2 years ago

Who benefited more from the ideas of social Darwinism, business leaders or workers?

djyliett [7]

The obvious answer would be business leaders. The reason why this is true is becaus business leaders were often the ones who were touting the ideas of social darwinism and how their company is better and will stomp out the smaller one in proper sociodarwinistic fashion.

6 0

3 years ago

2) How have human rights movements reshaped political, social, and economic

Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

The declaration has spawned other important treaties against racial, gender, and ability discrimination. Now 198 countries allow women to vote, compared to 91 in 1948, 57 per cent of countries have a human rights institution and 111 countries have adopted press freedom laws.

Explanation:

marek brileint

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Violence is only when there is a physical attack? A. False B. True

Irina-Kira [14]

False. According to the World Health Organization, any kind of action resulting physical harm or damage, and also any kind of psychological harm, damage and even maldevelopment of an individual can be construed as violence.

5 0

2 years ago

Do you think Brown v. Board of Education (1954) served its purpose of societal desegregation well? Or, do you think that that la

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

It didn't and it did. Just because the case happened in 1954 doesn't mean that schools ended segregation, as a matter of fact it lasted for almost a decade more, if not longer because schools would still refuse to obey. Southern communities were especially supportive of segregation, and even when the civil rights acts were implemented they still didn't support them and they didn't want to be around African-Americans only it had to be hidden. On the other hand, when a Supreme Court makes a decision it does sway people to support it. That is because there is an idea of everyone being equal in the eyes of law and the supreme court is the judge on what is lawful and what isn't based on the constitution. Since there's no greater legal act than the constitution, when the supreme court makes a decision it means that the decision fits the constitution and for many Americans the constitution is almost a holy document that guides their lives. A negative externality can be for example the rise of extremism. During the reconstruction period Ku Klux Klan rose as a negative externality of the era. During the civil acts era they grew stronger again because racist people were enraged by things like desegregation.

5 0

3 years ago