Answer:
The answer is Subjective Distress
Explanation:
Antisocial personality disorder is a mental condition whereby a person has a long-term destructive pattern of exploiting, manipulating, or violating the rights of anyone without remorse. They cause discomfort or distress to others by being deceitful, impulsive, showing socially unacceptable behavior.
The general diagnostic criteria for a personality disorder according to the DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic statistical manual of mental disorders), the pattern leads to clinically significant distress or impairment in social occupational, or other important areas of functioning. The personality traits must be inflexible, maladaptive and cause functional impairment or subjective distress.
Answer: <em>True.</em>
Controlling is a managerial functions which is considered to be an important function since it assists in checking the errors and thereby taking the corrective action, so the digression from the basics are minimized and goals of the company are accomplished in an adequate manner. Under modern concepts, control is known as a anticipative behavior whereas concept of control used earlier was only utilized when errors occurred.
Answer:
Here you go.
Explanation:
Canada has seen strong gains in cross-border trade in the NAFTA era: U.S. and Mexican investment in Canada has tripled since 1993. U.S. spending, accounting for more than half of Canada's FDI portfolio, rose from $70 billion in 1993 to more than $368 billion in 2013.
Answer:
The federal government runs all the states combined, under common federal law, while the state, or provincial government, operates under local state-wide laws. ... The federal government is where the federal laws that are made by the US Congress, are applied, while the state government is where state-wide laws made.
The government places health-risk warnings on cigarette and liquor packages which serve as a negative incentive.
Negative incentives are practices designed to dissuade acts that have been proven to be harmful to any environment. Health-risk warnings on cigarette and liquor packaging are meant to be a negative incentive, to discourage consumption, and to inform consumers of the probable health issues they could cause.
These warnings are not a voluntary action on part of the production companies but rather a legal requirement set by the government in order to dispel their use. The presence of these highly visible warnings on the packaging also protects the production companies from any legal action against them in case of any health issues suffered by the consumer as a direct result of using their product.
You can learn more about negative incentives at
brainly.com/question/2385156
#SPJ4