Many countries were affected by communism after World War II. Since I can't see your map, I'll just give some examples.
Cuba- USSR supplied them with missiles to use as a defense mechanism (Cuban Missile Crisis), this was the closest the USA and the USSR came to fighting a war
Eastern European Countries- USSR took over and they became communist
The USA- Engaged in a Cold War with USSR from 1945 and until 1991
Vietnam- Vietnam War, Communists won and took control
Korea- The communists from the North tried to take over the non-communist South. They went to war and ended up splitting it in the middle (38th parallel).
Answer:
Correct Answer:
b. No clear division of labor but each individual can accomplish any given task.
Explanation:
Model bureaucracies was developed by Max Weber, an early German sociologist. He believed that the increasing complexity of life would simultaneously increase the demands of citizens for government services.
<em>And, also that the ideal type of bureaucracy was one in which agencies are apolitical, hierarchically organized, and governed by formal procedures. Not having a clear division of of labour is not a characteristics of a model bureaucracy.</em>
I think the correct answer among the choices listed above is the second option. An opponent of Great Britain during the war was Italy. This is because Italy was allied with Germany and Japan (in a group known as the Axis) against the US Britain and France. Hope this answers the question.
<span>It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about 180 days to about a week.
This question is mildly ambiguous due to the word "communication". Does it mean "Speed of sending a message?" or "Speed of moving a physical object?" Given the available options as answers, I will assume the meaning is "Speed of moving a physical object?" With that in mind, let's look at the available options and see what makes sense.
It made coast-to-coast communication instantaneous.
* Even modern jets can't travel from coast to coast instantaneously, so you wouldn't expect a train to do so either. So this choice is just plain silly and therefore wrong.
It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about a week to about a day.
* A stagecoach had an average speed of about 5 mph and covered 60 to 70 miles per day. So it's not going to go from coast to coast in only a week. And since that part of the answer is wrong, this choice is wrong.
It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about 180 days to about a week.
* The 180 day estimate is definitely doable. That's an average speed of about 17 miles per day which is a good speed for a person walking day to day. And that would be about 400 miles per day for the train. The numbers make sense and this is the correct answer.
It made coast-to-coast communication more complicated.
* Let's see. Buy a train ticket and possibly arrange for 6 layovers. Or plan a multiple month trip and possibly coordinate that effort without having any rapid means of communications? This option is just plain silly when you consider the logistics of traveling for several months vs traveling for a mere week. So this is a bad choice.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
So the Marshall Plan aid to Germany, which amounted to about $1.4 billion in the first four years, was not that dramatic in itself. Britain, France and Italy all received a larger slice of the cake (see listing below for the distribution of help to the ERP countries
