New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
<h3>How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?</h3>
New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.
India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.
Find out more on the Austrialia colony at brainly.com/question/4196080.
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
There are differences between Judaism and Polytheism. Here are some of the differences:
1. Judaism is based on the belief that there is only God, whereas Polytheism before it is based on the belief that there are multiple gods.
2. Judaism believe that God doesn't have a body, that is God is neither a male gender nor female gender, whereas polytheism believe that gods have different characteristics including gender, which can be male or female
3. Judaism believes that God has no equal or any other good below and above him. On the other hand, Polytheism believes that gods are in the hierarchy. That is some are more powerful than others.
The Government should play an active role in the economy
<span>"C. The abbess sees an apparition of the Virgin Mary" is the "miracle" in Bede's "Caedmon's Hymn" but it could be considered two...
Hope That Helped =D</span>
As a result of Shay's rebellion, a number of people, who had
previously opposed the idea, came over to the side that that the
United States needed a different type of government from the
Articles of Confederation. As a result they went along with the
idea for a Constitutional Convention. The constitutional convention
decided they needed a way for the National Government to act
against a rebellion when congress was not in session. Congress had
not been in session during Shay's Rebellion and no one could
authorize national military action against the rebellion. As a
result they made the President the Commander in Chief of the
Military Forces. The President would always be on duty. He could
always take action.
shays' rebellion? it showed the people that the us govt was willing
to use force when necessary to keep peace and 2 protect the
constitution. it also showed that if citizens wanted 2 change a
law, they had to do so peaceful.
I hope this helps.
