The New England colonies were settled in Native American land. As they grew, they expanded further and further into Native American territory, not only pushing them from their homeland, but pushing them closer to other Native American tribes creating conflict among tribes. The New England colonies also stripped the area of its natural resources and beauty, as they wanted to make the new world just like Europe. This angered Native Americans, as their land was destroyed, and they were forced into unknown lands and into close contact with tribes that were before, foreign to them.
I am confused with this question what do we do?
Polymorphism allows a function or operator to perform different tasks depending on the types of the arguments or operands. Polymorphism is the use of a single symbol to represent many different kinds, or the provision of a single interface to entities of different types, in programming language theory and type theory.
The idea is to operator derived from a biological theory that states that an organism or species can go through a variety of shapes or stages. The 1960s saw a substantial increase in interest in polymorphic type systems, and by the end of the decade, actual implementations were starting to surface.
To learn more about operator, click here.
brainly.com/question/18301011
#SPJ4
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Rosa, who operates a Street Tacos restaurant in her apartment, is charged with criminal violations of the local health and building codes, state license regulations, and federal environmental statutes. To obtain a conviction, the prosecution must
a. persuade three-fourths of the jurors to agree on a guilty verdict. b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict. c. convince the court it is more likely than not that the charges are true d. prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rosa committed every essential element of an offense."
Answer:
b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict.
Explanation:
When convicting someone for the practice of a criminal offense, the judge imposes the penal sanction that the law provides: penalties of imprisonment, detention, simple imprisonment, restrictive rights and a fine. This conviction has other effects, both criminal and extra-penal. However, for a conviction to be carried out, the judge must reach a conclusion that the defendant is guilty. In order to reach this conclusion, it is necessary to show evidence that proves that the defendant is acting in disagreement with the law and therefore should be punished.
In the case shown in the question, for Rosa to receive a sentence, the charge imposed on her must show evidence as reasonably allowing a guilty verdict.
