HOW did the change in breast plates and helmets contribute to the decline of rome

History

2 answers:

kotegsom [21]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The change in breastplates and helmets contribute to decline of the Roman Empire by weakening the the military. It weaken them because the removal of it promote laziness and negligence of training and the such. It also removes the protection against ranged weapons which caused many casualties.

Hope This Helps! Have A Nice Day!!

gladu [14]3 years ago

5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The change in breastplates and helmets contributed to the decline of Rome in that it made the military mean softer; indeed it weakened the army of the once feared Roman Empire.

The armor and helmets were heavier and soldiers had to be more tough and physical. But they were gone -probably the Empire wanted to save money- soldiers appeared to show less character and fierceness. With less protection, there were more dead soldiers on the battlefield.

Other reasons for the decline of the Roman Empire were the invasion of the Barbaric tribes, too much territory to control, government corruption, and economic problems.

You might be interested in

In industries such as mining, steel and textiles, workers faced various challenging working conditions. what were some of the ch

saul85 [17]

Answer:

over regulation by the government

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following best describes the term reciprocity?

raketka [301]

a is the correct anwser

6 0

2 years ago

PLEAASEEEE HELP ME!!!!!!

boyakko [2]

Answer:

Well I think the answer to a is that the job of a republican government is to keep people free and equal and people can't be put out of their estate

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Q. 1) How did the several paradoxes in Indian society prevent the participation of several social groups in civil disobedience m

drek231 [11]

Answer: social movement, civic disobedience is a form of civic engagement

Explanation: b Social movements can be defined as a large connection or alliances of people who are bonded and connected for a common goal via interest shared in social change. Social movements most times speaks for a particular social change they know is important and needed in their present society and can still be an hindrance to some social change. various movement or alliances usually can or differently for a common goal or cause and they in all can still be called a social movement. this movement have sole purpose, strategically organized and all heads put together to achieve the goal stated. social change in the society are the birth product of social movement. Social movements can be local, national and even international .

<u>i hope it help.!</u>

<u />

7 0

2 years ago

In 1878, the Supreme Court denied George Reynolds right to practice bigamy which is a part of his Mormon religion. Why was Mr. R

enyata [817]

The Supreme Court said Mr. Reynolds could not break the law while practicing his religion.

Reynolds v. the United States was heard by the Supreme Court in 1878 in regard the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act placed on the Utah Territory.

Reynolds argued that preventing him to marry more than one woman was a violation of his First Amendment rights to protection of religion. The Supreme Court concluded that he had the right to his belief but he could not go around the law to practice his faith. The law stated marriage was to be between two people only and therefore he could not be married to more than one woman.

8 0

2 years ago