Answer:
The development of settlements
Explanation:
The development of settlements is the main factor responsible for the conversion of food gathering and hunting of animals to food production by growing crops on the land. The people settle on those areas where there is a fertile land and good climatic condition for growing crops. These crops provide food to these people and they change their profession from hunting to growing crops.
One major reason the Renaissance began in Italy is linked to its geography. The city-states of Italy, on the Mediterranean Sea, were centers for trade and commerce, the first port of call for both goods and new ideas. I'm not completely sure if it avoided crisis.
Italy was the core of the former Roman empire and at the collapse of the Byzantine empire in 1453, became the refuge for the intellectuals of Constantinople who brought with them many of the great works of the ancient Greeks and Romans, works that had been lost to the West during the Dark Ages. Prior to this, scholars in Italy had been examining the works of the ancients, but they were not very good and often incomplete.
The third reason was political. Because of many political changes, the Holy Roman Empire had essentially lost power in northern Italy, the papal states were governed by various leading families within each region, and the city of Naples dominated the South.
The Renaissance was a rebirth of ancient Greek and Roman thinking and styles, and both the Roman and Greek civilizations were Mediterranean cultures, as is Italy. The best single reason for Italy as the birthplace of the Renaissance was the concentration of wealth, power, and intellect in the Church.
<span>The Committees of Correspondence were the American colonies’ means for maintaining communication lines in the years before the Revolutionary War. In 1764, Boston formed the earliest Committee of Correspondence to encourage opposition to Britain’s stiffening of customs enforcement and prohibition of American paper money.
It was established by Samuel Adams and James Warren.</span>
Answer:
<h2>a, the use of trench warfare</h2>
Trench warfare in World War I meant that the armies dug into trenches to hold their ground. But it proved impossible for them to make any advances against each other. If they would try to mount an attack, venturing into "no man's land" between the trenches, they'd get mowed down by machine gun fire. In addition to bullets and artillery fire, trench warfare also came to involve the use of chemical weapons like mustard gas. Trench warfare in World War I was miserable and gruesome.
