What did the Public Works Administration need to work properly?

History

2 answers:

sladkih [1.3K]3 years ago

8 0

THE ANSWER IS C, I HOPE THIS HELPED!!

Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago

7 0

The Public Works Administration needed Roosevelt´s backing to work properly.

The PWA was a large scale public works construction agency created in June of 1933 in response to the Great Depression. It built large scale public works to provide employment and stabilize purchasing power to revive the economy.

It needed Roosevelt's backing because after having received considerable support from some important people it was left apart because of the enormous money it was supposed to spend, 3.3 billion dollars in the first year. But Roosevelt agreed to introduce PWA as part of his New Deal proposal.

I hope this answer helps you.

You might be interested in

Why do you think people feel so strongly about slavery? Try to see both points of view and give strong arguments for each side,

Igoryamba

Pro Slavery- Their thoughts- we white folks are richer and better than these poor "blacks" we should be in control of them, they can help us take care of crops and be our slaves, it will make life easier.
Anti Slavery- it's unconstitutional, and wrong for people to treat people this way.

I am 100% against slavery i just wanted to put both sides of an argument.
god bless and have a good day <3

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Russia s Communist government tried to improve food production by

Leona [35]

Russia's Communist government tried to improve food production by "<span>b. taking over ownership of farms," since this was part of their centrally planned economy (which ultimately failed).</span>

5 0

3 years ago

During which period did<br> the state legislature pass Louisiana's Black Code?

Oliga [24]

The state legislature passed Louisianas Black code at the period 1865-66

3 0

2 years ago

What symbolized the pharaohs’ wealth and power?

ira [324]

Answer:

b i think correct me if im wrong

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

2. How would you argue against Aristotle’s defense of Natural slavery? Did he make false assumptions? Were his arguments illogic

larisa [96]

Answer: Natural slavery is inhumane and degrading.

Explanation:

Although natural slavery seems like it makes sense for a constructive society and Aristotle thought that slaves needed their masters to survive because they were so helpless, he was generalizing and his argument is flawed when most of the slaves who were freed in the 1900s could survive well on their own. I think I can argue against Aristotles arguements for natural slavery because his assumption is that slaves were lesser, more inferior humans or tools. I can disprove these by the obvious mistreatment these slaves were put through like: their owner hitting them or starving them. People who were slaves could not marry or raise children without their owner’s permission. And their owner could sell them or their children at any time.

4 0

4 years ago