It allowed them fewer ships than the US and Britain limiting the kind of parity they hoped to have on the world stage in terms of naval power.
One of the arguments went that the US and Britain had to have larger navies because of their need to maintain a force in more than one operating theater while the Japanese only had to worry about their side of the Pacific. It wasn't something that made a number of hardcore military types within the Japanese leadership very happy, but they ended up signing the treaty anyway (though refused to renew it in the 1930s).
This is because iron is more reactive than copper in the metal reactivity series.
I need to see more of the question to answer
Answer:
Explanation:
the California gold rush
job opportunities in the US
political unrest in China
ALL the answers.
The National Reclamation Act funded irrigation projects in West America. So, as you can imagine - the most likely answer here is B! =)
