1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
3 years ago
7

Siddhartha Gautama was born about 2,500 years ago and was a spiritual leader in India. He changed his name to Buddha, which mean

s "The Awakened One." Which of these statements is true regarding the Buddha?
Social Studies
2 answers:
dimulka [17.4K]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer would be, the Buddha was born a prince into nobility in what is now Nepal.

The above mentioned statement is true regarding the Buddha.

Explanation:

Siddhartha Gautama, was a monk, sage, philosopher, religious leader in India. The teachings of Buddhism were founded and spread on the basis of his preaching. He was the founder of religion, Buddhism.  

Before the title Buddha, he was born in Nepal and his name was Siddhartha Gautama. He was a born prince, but after the awakening of religious and spiritual beliefs in himself, he became a Buddha.

He did not claimed himself a God, but he said that he was there to help the people in the world.

Learn more about Siddhartha Gautama at:

brainly.com/question/1056004

#LearnWithBrainly

tangare [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is b

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Some critics of masters and johnson's 4-phase model of the sexual response cycle believe that it focuses too much on
Zolol [24]
Genitals and leaves out psychological issues
<span>Tefer believes it leaves out important aspects, focusing too much on genital functioning and leaving out the psychological aspect
Basson agrees and feels that women's motivations for sex are more complex than men; driven by desire for intimacy
Tiefer and Basson believe nonsexual distractions of life interfere with a woman's ability to be sexually aroused</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Do you think it is a good or bad idea for Quebec to become an independent nation? Explain. (Please use RACE when answering this
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Yes, Quebec should be a country.

Canada is a federation, meaning that its citizens have to pay taxes for both the federal (canadian) government and the provincial (quebec) government. This split makes it harder for the people of Quebec to strategically invest in its own industries. For example, Quebec has long ago nationalized hydroelectricity making the state a leader in green energy. When Quebecers decided to do so, the canadian government refused to invest even a single dollar in the project. Quebec’s prime minister at that time had to go see the americans to ask for a sufficient loan. What a shame it was to the canadian government going against such a nice project! Fast forward to now, Nova Scotia government (another province located next to Quebec being part of the canadian confederation) has the project to built all the infrastructure to export hydroelectricity to the US… and guess what? Canadian Government is totally in favor of the idea and willing to fund the project with fresh capital, part of that capital coming from taxes paid by Quebecers. So Quebec taxes will help fund a competitor since Quebec is already exporting a lot of energy to their US partners while it had absolutely no help when they built their own hydroelectricity project.

This example is just one of the many examples that Quebecers have had to endure over the past decades. When the financial crisis happened in 08-09, Ontario’s auto industry have been bailed out for more than $10 Billion from the Canadian Government (again, part of this money - roughly 20% - came from Quebec’s taxes paid to the federal government). At that same time, Quebec was struggling with its paper/pulp industry and the federal government injected less than 100M$ in the industry to help it. Now Bombardier, one of the great engeneering business of Quebec is struggling, and guess what? Quebec has to inject all of the money to help them since canadian government won't do a single thing.

A lot of the people in Quebec stand against the building of pipelines that would allow dirty oil sands to cross the eastern part of the country for international exportation. Canadians want Quebec to accept the pipeline since it would help the western part of the country to export/sell its dirty oil internationally. As a province, Quebec doesn’t have any legal capacity to oppose to such project while this goes a lot against their willingness. If Quebec was a country, it could oppose to such thing and participate to a greater extend to a cleaner planet. Quebecers have all the capacity and knowledge to invest massively in clean energy and stop using oil for transport over a short timeframe. The only things that is keeping them away is the fact that it does not have control over all its revenues while the federal government have a totally different gameplan.

Being a country would allow Quebecers to gain 100% control over their taxes and would leave them with more money to do good things for the whole planet. We would be leaders in clean energy instead of subsidizing the dirty oilsands in the western part of the country. Our army would be one of peace keeping and territory protection and our peace keeping message would be heard amongst UN and UNESCO. We would be a much better leader amongst nations willing the reduce greenhouse gas instead of financing oil sands. Our engineering firms like Hydro-Quebec would be venturing project like electrification of transport.

Not only Quebec should be a country but people all around the world should support them in their quest for the building of a great new country.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can we make our country an ideal country?​
Alex

Answer:

An ideal country differs in people's opinion depending on their social and/or cultural background or upbringing. People would want a few basic things which generally include good weather,access to healthcare,water,sanitation,transport,facilities for entertainment,shopping,food,sports etc.. safety is an important factor and outdoor public spaces such as a beaches,parks,lakes contribute to people having a good quality of life and relaxation. The relative cost of basic amenities and some luxuries should be affordable for majority and people should not be discriminated by any government or commercial workplace due to their ancestry or heritage. This would be an ideal country however I doubt it exists in reality

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
NEED A FAST ANSWER!PLZ HELP!
Inessa05 [86]
I would have to go with The answer is A.
5 0
3 years ago
Anong uri ng komunikasyon ang naaakma sa kasalukuyang panahon? bakit?​
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

which language is this??

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a name of tropical cyclone
    8·1 answer
  • Tonya paid $10 for a new DVD, in this transaction,money is a?
    14·2 answers
  • What was one major reason that early peoples in North America were able to build complex cultures?
    13·1 answer
  • Description of population statistics incorporated
    6·1 answer
  • How does Aristotle view the human person as an embodied.?​
    7·1 answer
  • A way that Europeans increased their wealth in the West Indies during the 1600s and 1700s was by
    13·2 answers
  • What are marsupials? (the animal)
    5·2 answers
  • Body cells created by mitosis have ___ pairs of chromosomes.
    14·1 answer
  • This is a public service announcement. a poster that reads, "department of health. new york city. be wise. don't play with firec
    14·2 answers
  • Which caucasus country did not have a history of independence before the end of soviet rule?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!