Answer: reciprocity
Explanation: In simple words, reciprocity refers to the agreement in which two parties exchange goods or services in such a way that both of them will gain benefit from such agreement.
In business it can achieved in many ways, for example by combining the efforts and resources or by providing each other some service in exchange for service from the other side.
In the given case, Jason made a deal with dodge to provide service to him in exchange for service by him. Hence we can conclude that the given case depicts reciprocity.
Answer:
$88,920
Explanation:
capitalized interest = weighted average accumulated expenditure for the year x interest rate of the loan = $889,200 x 10% = $88,920
Capitalized interest can be added to the basis of the new building that is being constructed. This way, the building's depreciable value will increase.
Answer:
The goodwill is $1.1 million
Explanation:
In this question, first we have to compute the net asset which is shown below:
Net asset = Total asset - total liabilities
where,
Total asset = Land + building + inventory
= $1.7 million + $3.4 million + $2.2 million
= $7.3 million
And, the total liabilities = long term note payable = $1.5 million
So, the net asset would equal to
= $7.3 million - $1.5 million
= $5.8 million
Now the goodwill equal to
= Cash purchase price - net asset
= $6.8 million - $5.8 million
= $1.0 million
I think its true. I don't think its false so true
Answer:
The actual impact of the training can only be evaluated by comparing the performance of employees who underwent training and those who did not.
Explanation:
The reason is that when you conduct a post-lecture listening test then you are actually testing how much the person has absorbed the lecture which will not be reflected in the work that he will be assigned in near future. The main purpose of the training session is to make the workforce able to actually reflect the training lecture in the future work. This means if I want to increase the efficiency of the workforce then I will prefer to see whether or not the workforce which was trained have increased its work efficiency than the person who were not trained.