If you have an argument that is weak and uncogent, the conclusion may be either true or false.
An argument is a collection of two or more statements, one of which is supported by another. A conclusion is a proposition supported and a premise is a proposition supporting the conclusion. The purpose of an argument is to build a conclusion based on the premises or the evidence provided by the premises.
An inductive argument is one that claims that the conclusion follows with some degree of probability. In other words, premises make the conclusion more likely to be true, and premises true make the conclusion less likely to be false. Inductive arguments are powerful when given that the premises are true, the conclusion is unlikely to be false.
An inductive argument is weak when the conclusion is likely false given the premises are true. A strong argument is cogent if the premise is correct. A strong argument is uncogent if at least one of its premises is wrong.
Know more about uncogent argument here
brainly.com/question/13445406
#SPJ4
Answer:
Short term climate changes are only temporary, they will come and go and they won't have a major effect on the ecosystem. Long term climate changes, on the other hand, are not as temporary, they either stay forever or long enough that we can say forever, and they have a huge effect on the ecosystem.
Explanation:
One example of a short term climate change is the seasons, it gets colder in the winter, but that is only a temporary change and even though the ecosystem changes, it is only small changes, and they are reversible.
One example of a long term climate change is the last ice age, it lasted a very long time, and had huge effects, like long-lasting frigid temperatures and frozen oceans, that had a huge effect on the ecosystem, which then took a very long time to expel.
Answer:
(C) The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
Explanation:
State laws have more authority than local laws. For this reason, when a statuary law is sanctioned, it must replace existing local laws for the same subject. It is at this point that we can observe what the problem with the petition shown in the above question may be, making this petition circulating misleading to some readers.
Many cities, counties, and others have local smocking restriction laws that are much broader than the state law the petition wants to be sanctioned. Some people do not understand the relationship between state and local laws and will think this state law will help local smocking restriction law, when in fact state law will replace it.
Answer:
??????))(//(()&6__7_**_7"78'-'88-
Answer:
With the promulgation of its constitution in 2015, Nepal replaced a unitary government with a federal system of government. This process has made Nepal a federal democratic republic governed with three levels of government: a federal level, seven provinces and 753 local government.
I hope it help you,
God blessed you.
Follow me for more answer
