Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the design should positively influence consumer behavior. This is because it has been implemented specifically for this. Marcus hopes that the smell would put customers at ease and make them like the store as well as the products more, which in term would increase sales.
Answer:
$1,901,385
Explanation:
First unit produced by lambda took 5,000 hours to produce and required $30,000 worth of materials and equipment usage.
The second unit took 4,500 hours and used $24,000 worth of materials and equipment usage.
learning rate = time needed to produce second unit / time needed to produce first unit = 4,500 hours / 5,000 hours = 90%
materials and equipment usage rate = $24,000 / $30,000 = 80%
using the attached table of cumulative values, we can determine the cumulative improvement factors needed to solve this question:
Olsan's accumulated cost for producing 20 more guidance controls
-
work hours = 4,500 x 14.61 (90% and 20 units) x $25 per hour = $1,643,625
- materials and equipment = $24,000 x 10.74 (95% and 20 units) = $257,760
- total = $1,901,385
True-No conflict will exist between the NPV and IRR methods, when used to evaluate two equally risky but mutually exclusive projects, if the projects' cost of capital exceeds the rate at which the projects' NPV profiles cross.
<h3>
What is NPV and IRR methods?</h3>
While the IRR approach calculates the projected percentage return, the NPV method produces the predicted dollar worth of a project.
Purpose. The breakeven cash flow level of a project is the emphasis of the IRR approach while project surpluses are the subject of the NPV method.
assistance with decisions. Since it provides a dollar return, the NPV approach delivers an outcome that serves as the basis for an investment decision. The IRR approach is not helpful in making this choice because its percentage return does not indicate to the investor how much money will be produced.
Reinvestment rate. When NPV is utilized, the firm's cost of capital is the assumed rate of return for reinvesting intermediate cash flows; when it is the internal rate of return.
To learn more about NPV and IRR methods from the given link:
brainly.com/question/21241533
#SPJ4
Answer:
Weight of debt = 0.2453 or 24.53%
Weight of preferred stock = 0.0486 or 4.86%
Weight of common equity = 0.7061 or 70.61%
Explanation:
The WACC or weighted average cost of capital is the cost of a firm's capital structure. The capital structure of a company can consist of one or more of the following components namely debt, preferred stock and common stock.
To calculate the WACC, we use the market value of each component.
- The market value of debt is$101 million.
- The market value of common equity is 290.7 million
- The value of preferred stock is $20 million
Market value of common equity = 51 * 5.7 = 290.7 million
The weights to assigned to each components are,
Total weight of all components = 101 + 20 + 290.7 = 411.7 million
Weight of debt = 101 / 411.7 => 0.2453 or 24.53%
Weight of preferred stock = 20 / 411.7 => 0.0486 or 4.86%
Weight of common equity = 290.7 / 411.7 => 0.7061 or 70.61%
