In North America in the parts north of the present day Mexico, the First Nations had climatically a more hostile environment to deal with than their counterparts in the now Mexico and Mesoamerica and South America. The winters on the Great Plains and in the now Canadian north were harsh and did not favor large populations to develop (with some exceptions like in British Columbia, Canada which had a mild climate and in which 100's of 1000's of First Nations lived). So the mainly plains Indians had a nomadic existence following the game and fish and so had a more egalitarian less centralized leadership than their counterparts to the south. In Mexico, Mesoamerica and South America, the climate was generally less harsh, and fairly large scale agriculture was practiced and the people were more sedentary and political power was held in the hands of rulers who though they had henchmen, tended to be all-powerful, though the Incas for example had a quite equitable system of compulsory labour for public works and mines, allowing time for the participants to work their own fields to sustain their families.
C. is assembly line
A. is vertical integration
B. is horizontal integration
Answer:
Bryan very much idealized the individual American, particularly the farmer, as prime example of democracy, like Jefferson, and less elegantly, Jackson. All three were equally skeptical of the concept of masses of urban industrial workers, though for different reasons.
McKinley, coming from the Republicans, then the party of distinguished patrician interest and privilege, was much more quick to see small scale movements like the Populists as rabble rousing, relying instead upon the wise leadership of the well bred. in the same way, Hamilton actively disliked "the people' thinking them lazy, feckless and ignorant. He did not believe democracy need be all inclusive.
They helped in war and job fair
