Answer:
<h2>
Dessalines’s leadership:</h2>
<em>After defeating the french who wanted to retake Saint Dominique, Dessalines proclaimed the colonies independence, successfully creating the world's first nation of former slaves and the second independent country in the western hemisphere. He published a declaration of independence, abolishing the colony of saint Domingue forever. In the months following the haitian independence, Dessalines ordered the slaughter of the remaining french residents in Haiti to remove french presence in the colony and to make sure slavery could not be reinstated. Crowned emperor in october 1804.</em>
<h2>
Louverture’s leadership:</h2>
<em>To win rebel support, the Spanish promised land and freedom to all rebel soldiers and their families. In early 1793, many rebel leaders joined the spanish army against the french. Under the spanish, a military leader named Toussaint Louverture rose to prominence, and later became one of the most prominent leaders of the revolution. He was a free black who was formerly part of the slave elite. Known for his military and strategic brilliance, his army grew to several thousand under the french.</em>
<em />
<em />
<h2>I hope this helps.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h2>
<em />
Answer:
Kaiser Wilhelm II did not “fire” Otto von Bismarck. Instead, Bismarck resigned his office because of his disagreements with the Kaiser. ... Bismarck wanted Germany to unify and fought a series of wars to cause this to happen. When Germany unified in 1871, Bismarck became chancellor of the new country.
Explanation:
In 1215, a band of rebellious medieval barons forced King John of England to agree to a laundry list of concessions later called the Great Charter, or in Latin, Magna Carta. Centuries later, America’s Founding Fathers took great inspiration from this medieval pact as they forged the nation’s founding documents—including the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
For 18th-century political thinkers like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, Magna Carta was a potent symbol of liberty and the natural rights of man against an oppressive or unjust government. The Founding Fathers’ reverence for Magna Carta had less to do with the actual text of the document, which is mired in medieval law and outdated customs, than what it represented—an ancient pact safeguarding individual liberty.
“For early Americans, Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence were verbal representations of what liberty was and what government should be—protecting people rather than oppressing them,” says John Kaminski, director of the Center for the Study of the American Constitution at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “Much in the same way that for the past 100 years the Statue of Liberty has been a visual representation of freedom, liberty, prosperity and welcoming.”
When the First Continental Congress met in 1774 to draft a Declaration of Rights and Grievances against King George III, they asserted that the rights of the English colonists to life, liberty and property were guaranteed by “the principles of the English constitution,” a.k.a. Magna Carta. On the title page of the 1774 Journal of The Proceedings of The Continental Congress is an image of 12 arms grasping a column on whose base is written “Magna Carta.
