1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stels [109]
3 years ago
9

which of the following empires murdered over one million Americans and hundreds of thousands of Greeks? A. British Empire B. Ott

oman Empire C. Austro-Hungarian Empire D. Russian Empire
History
2 answers:
Ksju [112]3 years ago
8 0

B. The Ottoman Empire (APEX)

elixir [45]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B is correct

You might be interested in
Worth 70 points. Help me out.
Allisa [31]

Explanation:

black

<h2>markme as brainlest</h2>

pls

8 0
2 years ago
How did television contribute to the conformity of the 1950s? Television shows encouraged people to be individuals. Television a
Serhud [2]

The correct answer is Television portrayed a lifestyle that many people tried to imitate.


The popularity of TV during the 1950's helped to shape a conformist culture in the US. A majority of the programs during this era were family friendly and portrayed an idealic, suburban lifestyle that Americans tried to imitate. This included shows like "I Love Lucy" and "Leave it to Beaver."

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List the factors which brought The first world War?​
yanalaym [24]

1. Friends don’t let friends fight alone

A tangled web of strong political alliances among nations meant that most great powers felt obliged to help their partners once war was declared.

After the murder of an Austrian Archduke by Serbian assassins, Austria-Hungary prepared for war against Serbia, which was allied with Russia.

Once Russia mobilized, Austria-Hungary’s ally, Germany, declared war on both Russia and Russia’s ally, France. Great Britain and its empire, sympathetic to France, declared war on Germany (Canada was not consulted).

Alliances originally intended as defensive pacts ended up looking threatening to outsiders. This perilous network of allegiances is an accepted part of all narratives about the First World War. German historian Andreas Hilgruber was one of many who showed how dangerous and costly all of these alliances were.

2. Armed to the teeth

Europe in 1914 was armed to the teeth. Vast fleets of warships were being constructed, conscription was implemented in most of the great powers to allow large armies to be kept in reserve, weapons and ammunition were stockpiled, and detailed war plans were made.

The impact of the proliferation of the instruments of war as a cause of the outbreak of the conflict was highlighted by David Stevenson’s Armaments and the Coming of War (1996). A large army spoiling for a fight may well seek one out.

3. Capitalist imperialism

During the First World War, Vladimir Lenin, the father of the Soviet Union, wrote an essay entitled Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), in which he laid out the foundation of his own philosophy of communism.

He believed that the war was the product of capitalist financial monopolies within states, which created national rivalries and led the great powers into a destructive conflict over access to raw materials and undeveloped markets.

Others since have blamed imperialism itself and commercial interests.

4. War on a tight schedule

A.J.P. Taylor, one of the 20th century’s great historians, argued in War by Timetable (1969) that in 1914, thanks to relatively new transportation (railroad) and communications (telegraph and telephone) technologies, every European power believed that the ability to mobilize their armies faster than their neighbours would by itself deter war.

Every power drafted elaborate mobilization timetables so that they could outrace their potential opponents. When the crisis of 1914 occurred, none of the leaders really wanted war, according to Taylor, but each felt they had to mobilize faster than the others or lose the advantage.

They became the victims of their own logistical preparations, and Europe slid unwillingly but relentlessly into war. Barbara Tuchman’s book The Guns of August (1962) similarly identified the dangers of technology in causing conflicts to escalate rapidly.

5. Blame Germany

In the Treaty of Versailles that officially ended the war, Germany was made to accept the blame for causing the conflict, and after that German governments spent decades denying their sole responsibility.

They convinced many people, but after the Second World War, German historian Fritz Fischer looked into previously-classified archives for the first time. Fischer concluded in his book German War Aims in the First World War (1961) that Imperial Germany had deliberately provoked a general war as part of a policy of conquest much like that undertaken by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany 20 years later.

Fischer’s conclusions remain controversial to this day.

6. No, blame Britain

The idea that Britain caused the war was the live grenade that firebrand historian Niall Ferguson lobbed into the debate when he wrote The Pity of War (1999), though Paul Schroeder had put forward a similar argument earlier.

Ferguson claimed that not only did British statesmen encourage France and Russia to oppose Germany, but that Britain’s own intervention turned a regional European brawl into a global war.

The British may not have directly started it, according to Ferguson, but they were liable for greatly expanding the scope of the war and making it drag on as long as it did.

7. People being people

Canadian historian Margaret Macmillan has published a major book, The War That Ended Peace (2013), which presents a synthesis of many different factors: alliances and power politics; reckless diplomacy; ethnic nationalism; and, most of all, the personal character and relationships of the almost uncountable number of historical figures who had a hand in the coming of war.

Her work helps to highlight the fact that for all the great and powerful forces that seemed to grind the world inexorably into war in 1914, everything ultimately came down to the beliefs, prejudices, rivalries, and schemes of a great array of personalities and people.

3 0
3 years ago
The Nuremberg Laws stated all Jewish citizens
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

C. In one part of town (ghetto).

Explanation:

The 1935 Nuremberg Laws, an anti-Semitic law designed and executed by the German Nazi government was one of the harshest and initial acts of racial discrimination against the Jewish people. This law would become the base for which a citizen of Germany is accepted or not as a legal citizen or be termed as a Jew.

According to this law, the definition of a Jew is someone who is born not only a Jew but also has Jewish grandparents. Moreover, it also termed a person a Jew even if that person does not follow the Jewish religious beliefs. Also, they were made to live in one part of the town where they were grouped and put together, and not mix with the 'common' German people.

Thus, the correct answer is option C.

4 0
2 years ago
How did Jackie Mabley relate to the Harlem Renaissance movement<br>​
I am Lyosha [343]

This Renaissance was an African-American movement that took place in the late 1920s and 1930s, it became known as the Harlem Renaissance precisely because it started in the neighborhood of Harlem in the United States.  It was in this period that directors, editors and critics realized that the expressions of art of the African American people were beginning to draw the nation's attention in an expressive way, something that was stronger in literature, however, in other art forms there were also great exponents African-American.

The Harlem Renaissance began to emerge in the midst of an intellectual and social upheaval that eventually emerged and spread throughout the 20th century African American community. Something that happened right after the North American Civil War that ended up generating a black middle class, something that favored the emergence of jobs and better education conditions for Afro descendants.

Jackie Mabley "Moms Mabley" adopted her theatrical name, Jackie Mabley, from that of an old friend. Later on she was known as "Moms" because she was truly a "Mom" for many other comedians from the 1950s and 1960s. At the age of 27, she declared herself a lesbian, and was one of the first artists on the comedy circuit to be qualified as triple-X

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the riots at the 1968 Democratic National Convention and the Kent State protest in 1970 have in common?
    10·2 answers
  • Was the rule of Pericles a “golden age” for Athens? Explain.
    10·1 answer
  • Which family ruled florence during most of the fifteenth century?
    8·1 answer
  • Hi this is a bible question please help. Grace is the unmerited favor of God to make us acceptable and give us right standing in
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a social effect of the Industrial Revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • so a teacher asked me what state I would like to go and write about and I'm lost because I don't know at because they all seem p
    14·1 answer
  • Who can list 5 type of history for me please​
    6·2 answers
  • The Mongol invasions in Asia
    9·1 answer
  • What is the Shahadah?
    14·2 answers
  • Pls help, its easy but dont pay attention, pls help
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!