1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brums [2.3K]
3 years ago
12

This report describes the 2012 arrest of yevgeniy urlashov, the mayor of the large russian city of yaroslavl. according to urlas

hov, what led to his arrest?
History
1 answer:
inn [45]3 years ago
6 0

<span>Less than a year into his rule Urlashov was arrested and charged with corruption, an occurrence that Urlashov claims was politically motivated. Urlashov was a member of a political party that opposed the ruling Russian government, which, he says, motivated the government to remove him from power.</span>

You might be interested in
Which of the following was an effect of the Boston Massacre?
Harlamova29_29 [7]
One effect of the Boston Massacre was that "John Adams was criticized for defending the British soldiers who were involved," since he felted that they deserved fair representation.
8 0
3 years ago
The yellow press in the US pushes the country to war.
larisa [96]

Answer:

what is the question

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which four countries signed the Munich Agreement?
klio [65]

Answer:

Germany, Great Britain, France, and Italy

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
• Do you think the Sedition Act was necessary? Why or why not?
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

No, I do not think it was necessary.

Explanation:

The Sedition act was uncharacteristic of the initial thoughts of the forefathers of the United States because it went against the freedom of speech and freedom of press. Although it seemed to be a quick fix to stop dissention in the U.S. with anti war sentiment, it also invalidated the very constitution for which the U.S stood on. There could have been better ways to handle it such as educating the public better on what exactly was happening, and why we might as a country needed to become involved in the war.

6 0
3 years ago
Describe two benefits and two challenges of transitioning to a democratic form of government.
sammy [17]

Answer:

In modern political thought, there are two approaches to the justification of democracy as the best system of government: value-based and rationally utilitarian. Value justifications regard democracy as a value in itself, as a political system that most fully embodies the most important humanistic values: freedom, equality, justice, etc.

The value approach is criticized primarily for its appeal to a democratically minded person who is truly striving for freedom and political equality. However, in the modern world, very many people, if not most, prefer not freedom (which they often perceive even as anti-value), but material well-being, security, and order. Therefore, they put a non-political, social meaning in the most respected values ​​of equality and justice, linking them to ensuring equal opportunities in life or rewarding merit, to which real democracy has a very weak relationship. All this casts doubt on the value group of arguments in favor of democracy.

A rational-utilitarian approach does not deny the certain significance of the value justifications of democracy, but at the same time pushes them to the background. This approach interprets democracy primarily as the most rational, useful way for citizens to organize a political system, allowing them to articulate and harmoniously combine their interests. The most consistently rational-utilitarian group of arguments is expressed in the systemic justifications of democracy: Democracy helps to prevent the rule of dictators, curb power, guarantee the protection of citizens from state arbitrariness; Democracy provides a higher level of economic development and higher rates of economic growth.

Of course, democracy, like any other political system, is not free from serious shortcomings, which, in fact, represent a continuation of its merits. Usually attention is paid to the following weaknesses of democracy:

1. The threat of destabilization of the political system arising from the very principle of election.

2. Political competition can result in conflictogenicity, confrontation, open clashes and, therefore, destabilization of the situation in society.

3. The danger of the tyranny of the majority, confident in its "rightness" and suppressing the will of those who remain in the minority.

4. Possible unprofessionalism of officials elected by an incompetent majority.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following became known as the “sick man of Europe” in the 1800s?
    11·2 answers
  • What material might eventually replace iron
    13·1 answer
  • In a sentence or two, explain what Erasmus meant when he said the following.
    6·1 answer
  • How does a silk road contribute to cultural diffusion​
    8·1 answer
  • What was buddhas given name? Please answer quick
    6·2 answers
  • How did Northerners oppose the Fugitive Slave Act?
    6·2 answers
  • Why are the Tigris and Euphrates important rivers
    14·1 answer
  • Where did the woman suffrage movement begin
    15·1 answer
  • Progressives believed that direct election of senators would help _______________.
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand lead to WWI?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!