I'm pretty sure the answer is A. Bird
Answer: Sanger Rainsford with the love of hunting, used to chasing wild diversion. By the time he was stranded in Zaroff's island, he stops to be a hunter and turns into the hunted. This change everything that Rainsford knew before. He couldn't believe that he will become a prey his entire life. Rainsford swings to his own particular chasing abilities as ingrained instincts. He starts to acquire gratefulness for the equivocation of the creatures he hunted, and what the hunt is about from both viewpoints. Particularly when he begins turning the tables on General Zaroff. At the point when Rainsford, in the end, wins the "diversion," he is just about finished with "amusement" chasing.
Explanation:
Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
Answer:
C) The play "Hamlet," unlike other Shakespeare tragedies, fails at its dramatic task.
Its to persuade and encourage tourists to visit, sight-see, and do some activities and to also spend money in the state.
