Answer:
The characters learn to appreciate what they have.
Explanation:
Both stories have characters that wished they had different lives, but when they tried them out, they ended up not liking the other character's life and wanted their normal routine and life back.
Answer:
A conclusion that is in favour:
"Using public money to maintain national landmarks is a good policy in the sense that a national landmark is a public good: no one can be excluded from enjoying the view of a national landmark like the Arch in St. Louis for example.
Because they are public goods, national landmarks are not likely to be profitable or provided by the private sector in a free market, and for this reason, government intervention in the form of public money becomes necessary".
Answer:
Atticus tells Scout that a Cunningham was on the jury and didn't want to convict Tom. This Cunningham thought that Tom was innocent. The jury actually had to think about the conviction before they did it.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!! :D
This should be a writer's opinion
That is because it might differ based on who was talking. Some might disagree that it has become run-down, or some might say that it has become such way before "just recently".
If this was the missing excerpt:
Millicent sat down at her desk in the big study hall. Tomorrow she would come to school, proudly, laughingly, without lipstick, with her brown hair straight and shoulder length, and then everybody would know, even the boys would know, that she was one of the elect. Teachers would smile helplessly, thinking perhaps: So now they've picked Millicent Arnold. I never would have guessed it.
—"Initiation,"
<span>Sylvia Plath
</span>
It can be inferred that Millicent has not always been popular. A lot of people did not take any notice of her. It can even be said that she is a wallflower. Somebody who is there but remains unnoticed.
