1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rodikova [14]
2 years ago
6

A parliamentary system experiences fewer conflicts between the executive branch and the legislative branch than does a president

ial system. Why? The parliamentary system has checks and balances on executive power. The members of the executive branch are also members of parliament. Members of the cabinet are elected to their positions by the people. Many countries with parliamentary systems are also democracies.
History
2 answers:
Lynna [10]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The members of the executive branch are also members of parliament.

Explanation:

This is the main reason why parliamentary systems experience fewer conflicts between the executive and the legislative branch. It is also one of the most important differences between the presidential and the parliamentary systems. In a parliamentary system, the executive is chosen out of the members of Parliament. Therefore, the separation between these two powers is less clear than in presidential systems, where the executive is a completely separate office elected independently from the legislative.

goldfiish [28.3K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The members of the executive branch are also the member of the parliament.

Explanation:

The members of the executive are also members of the parliament is the main reason why there is less conflict between the executive and the legislative. and they are required to get the political confidence first to execute laws. The relationship of confidence between the executive and the legislative is an important feature of the parliamentary governments and for that confidence, both should have a common policy program. Unlike the presidential system, there is no strict separation of the powers between the executive and the legislative bodies as the members of the legislature is also the member of the executive.

You might be interested in
If a crystal cools rapidly, it will be A. small B. strong C. large D. brittle​
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

its  b

bonnie and clyde

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
This important part of the Torah told the Israelites to be loyal to God. Name it.
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

the ten commandments

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Helppppp nowwwww
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

The Constitution also provides that the Senate advise and consent on key executive of the United States Constitution, based primarily on Supreme Court case law and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect.

Explanation: not 100% sure

6 0
3 years ago
What are some similarities and differences between the Magna Carta, Declaration of Independence, and Bill of Rights?
Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

Similarities:

-The two documents are popular in their countries of origin with the Magna Carta being popular in Britain and the Declaration being popular in the United States.

- The documents were both borne out of rebellion; the Magna Carta was first established after conflicts between the King and rebel barons and the Declaration was established after conflict between the thirteen American states and Great Britain.

-The two documents both sought to assert individual human freedoms and rights.

Differences:

- Where the Declaration confirms that power rests with the people, the Magna Carta asserted that power rests with the sovereign until changes through the Six Statutes sought to limit these powers.

- In the Magna Carta the rights of the people are granted by the government while in the Declaration, people's rights are God given. The Declaration was based on universal principles regarding all human beings but the Magna Carta was based on a particular group of people (barons) but which was later changed to the more inclusive term any freeman.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which conference was held to decide how to address the issues arising from the surrender of Nazi Germany
Dennis_Churaev [7]
It was the Potsdam Conference that decided on how to address the issues arising from the surrender of Nazi Germany. The conference was attended by <span>The Big Three — Soviet leader Joseph Stalin, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (replaced on July 26 by Prime Minister Clement Attlee), and U.S. President Harry Truman — in which they met in </span>Potsdam<span>, Germany, from July 17 to August 2, 1945, to negotiate terms for the end of World War II.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • John quincy adams was an ardent expansionist. what actions did he support to help the united states become the "first and mighti
    8·1 answer
  • How were japan and china similar to each other
    11·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Palmer raids
    7·2 answers
  • N which election did president roosevelt receive the least support for his new deal program?
    11·1 answer
  • During world war ll, which battle denied the Japanese the opportunity to attack Australia?
    7·1 answer
  • What kind of homework do students in Japan do?<br> How long do they study each day
    9·1 answer
  • Which situation helped cause the stock market crash of 1929?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the political changes that took
    15·1 answer
  • Drag the tiles to the boxes to form correct pairs.
    5·1 answer
  • Answer ASAP Please!!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!