Answer:
The best example of legal pluralism is that Indian litigants could have their cases tried in local or British courts, with their own legal customs applied.
Explanation:
Legal pluralism is a situation in which a territory has several different legal orders and legal systems, often based on the fact that society consists of several social groups with different cultures and traditions or that a state territory has shared sovereignty within, therefore having two nations applying their respective laws. In a situation where there is legal pluralism, the individual group affiliation will determine which legal order the person's case belongs to, or also which legal system the case is processed in. Legal pluralism is in contrast to legal centralism, which is characterized by a common legal order in a territory.
<span>Wages of the workers were low and prices were high and landowners, on the other hand, only got wealthier after independence. Wealthy landowners were the only people who could afford to buy the lands, and they all bought it.</span>
Tanks could be used to open a hole in enemy lines, but the burnt of the fighting must be done by infantry units. Early tanks for the allies had limited transverse movement for the turret, because their primary purpose was to serve as a gun platform for the infantry units coming behind them.
Answer:
There is little doubt that the widespread use of the automobile, especially after 1920, changed the rural and urban landscapes in America. It is overly simplistic to assume, however, that the automobile was the single driving force in the transformation of the countryside or the modernization of cities. In some ways automobile transport was a crucial agent for change, but in other cases it merely accelerated ongoing changes.
In several respects, the automobile made its impact felt first in rural areas where cars were used for touring and recreation on the weekends as opposed to replacing existing transit that brought people to and from work in urban areas. Some of the earliest paved roads were landscaped parkways along scenic routes. Of course, rural people were not always very pleased when urban drivers rutted unpaved roads, kicked up dust, and generally frightened or even injured livestock. Yet, cars potentially could help confront rural problems—isolation, the high cost of transporting farm products, and the labor of farm work. Although farmers may have resisted the automobile at first, by the 1920s per capita automobile ownership favored the rural family. Adoption was uneven in rural areas, however, depending on income, availability of cars, the continuing reliance on horses, and other factors. Automobile manufacturers did not lose sight of this market and courted potential customers with advertisements touting that cars were “Built for Country Roads” or promoting vehicles that would lead to “The Passing of the Horse.”
Explanation:
hope it helps LOLOLOOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
