Answer:
The Major difference between Sanction and Remedy is that Sanction is mainly used in Criminal matters while Remedy is used in Civil matters.
Explanation:
A sanction is a punishment meted on a person guilty of a criminal offence. Sanction occurs after an offender is taken to court to face the charges against him/her. After arguments are canvassed by the Prosecutor and the Defence Attorney, the Judge then arrives at a decision/verdict and the offender is sentenced to a minimum or a maximum number of years in Prison. Criminal offences include Armed Robbery, Murder, Assault, Stealing, etc.
A remedy is a compensatory method for people who have been harmed by the act or negligence of another person. The Remedies a Plaintiff is entitled to are Damages (Monetary compensation), Specific Performance, Injunction, etc.
Answer:
The Cheyenne weren't always a nomadic tribe. They became a nomadic, horse-based culture in order to adapt to changing conditions. ... This switch prompted them to abandon their farming lifestyle and convert to a full-fledged Plains horse-culture tribe. The fourth stage is the reservation phase.
Explanation:
Hope this Helps :)
Answer:
d. It made the processes of hiring and promoting employees within the organization far more complex.
Explanation:
The 1964 Civil Rights Act has changed the hiring structure for African Americans as it prohibits segregation in public offices and prohibited employment discrimination based on race, color, culture, religion, sex or nationality. It gave way for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to uplift the downtrodden blacks in the United States. This legislative measure was a major breakthrough to provide economic opportunities and employment dignity to the African Americans.
The Cuban missile crisis proves that the ' cooler heads prevailed' as the conflict did not escalate.
Explanation:
The Cuban missile crisis was the closest that the world ever got to a full blown world war with nuclear weapons and it was the heads that were cool and composed during these times of frenzy that saved the two nations.
By the end of the crisis it was understood that both sides did not want the conflict and would rely on the doctrine of mutually assured destruction to not escalate future conflicts.
Thus the end shows that in fact cooler heads prevailed in this time.
