Answer:
it has not entierly been done away with in the Modern Age And they are still often used in certain styles of photography, But is often condemned for the lack of detail in the background, as well as lack of color.
Explanation:
It Can be argued we do not often use the technique anymore in modern art, due to factors like lack of color As well as the fact that oil paint was the traditionally used medium for this, which is now not the most popular medium in modern-day art. But it can still be seen in some of the Styles we use nowadays, Although it is An artistic choice, not a must in any way. We see it especially in photography as the lighting is intentionally changed at times And the color is even bleached from photos to achieve an effect that focuses on the main focal point of the photo. although The more pure use of the style is often condemned because of lack of detail in the background.
1.) 3 situations for depth of field would be to a garden, a field or meadow, and a tree.
2.) same thing as number 1
Think of Einstein’s theory of general relativity. If a wide receiver making a catch collides in midair with the defender, the defenders often fair little better in these situations because they tend to run a little larger than receivers. But it is not a matter of force. Newton’s third law of motion (“to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction / the mutual actions of two bodies upon eachother are always equal and directed to contrary parts”) implies that this issue has to do with momentum, the product of mass and velocity. A force between two objects is an interaction that changes momentum. If the momentum of one increases, the momentum of the other will decrease by a substantial amount. All that is needed to be thought about is is the momentum right before the two come into contact and the momentum right after they stop interacting.
Answer:the answer is iso and aperture
Explanation:
The correct answer is texture
