Answer:
C. They act up on two different bodies.
Explanation:
Newton's third law of motion states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Action-reaction force pairs make it possible for fishes to swim, birds to fly, cars to move etc.
For example, while driving down the road, a firefly strikes the windshield of a car (Action) and makes a quite obvious mess in front of the face of the driver (Reaction) i.e the firefly hit the car and the car hits the firefly.
The ultimately implies that, in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on two different interacting objects or bodies.
Hence, the statement which is true about action and reaction forces with respect to Newton's third law of motion is that they act up on two different bodies.
In conclusion, action-reaction force pairs are characterized by the following statements;
I. They act up on two different bodies.
II. The forces are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction.
III. The forces are the same type such as magnetic force, contact force or gravitational force.
The answer is Great. One word to describe Zeus is graet
Basically it is to organize your thoughts. You would usually make a Topic Web before you do a research paper, or essay.
Hope this is the answer you were looking for and that it helps!! :)
Answer:
Deductive logic
Explanation:
The Cognitive development theory of Jean Piaget suggests that there are four stages through which a child develops mentally.
The fourth or the last stage of the theory is the Formal Operational Stage. <u>This occurs at the age of 12 and above. In this stage, a child develops through certain skills such as </u><u>systematic planning</u><u>, </u><u>deductive reasoning</u><u>, etc</u>.
According to Piaget, deductive logic or reasoning is a type of reasoning that involves using of general statement or hypothesis to reach a particular outcome.
The sentence given in the question is an example of deductive reasoning.
<u>The general statement is </u><u><em>"if all people are equal" </em></u><u>and the outcome abstracted from this general statement is </u><u><em>"then you and I must be equal."</em></u>
So, the correct answer is deductive reasoning.
