1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BlackZzzverrR [31]
3 years ago
7

Why did Texas suffer less from the war than other areas of the South?

History
1 answer:
Trava [24]3 years ago
6 0
In the Civil War, Texas (young Texas) served as a support state, and there was barely any skrimishes in the state. Technically, by the governor's word (The governor at the time was Sam Houston), Texas was originally pro-Union, but the citizens wantes war as a way to assert the state's rights. Also, Texas did not fight for wealthy plantation owners in other states;<u> </u><u>Texas didn't have any cotton plantations compared to the other Southern states, so they didn't suffer as bad as a loss than the other states</u>. Moreover, during the battles outside of the state, the Texan soldiers either deserted from warfare or joined the Union.
You might be interested in
The following excerpt is the epigraph from All Quiet on the Western Front. An epigraph is a sentence or short paragraph that pre
nordsb [41]

The main point of the excerpt is that readers should be aware of the damage that the war has done to a generation of men who were impacted by it, and read the book with this idea in mind.

The epigraph wants to make sure that readers who approach this book do it with the same purpose as the one with which the author wrote it. He does not want the readers to think of this book as an accusation, a confession or an adventure.

4 0
3 years ago
Como intentaron las potencias coloniales europeas hacer que los africanos dependieran de los bienes importados?
natka813 [3]

Answer:

No sé si esto ayudará, pero espero que lo dosifique

Explanation:

Este artículo abarca la diplomacia mundial y, más en general, las relaciones mundiales de las grandes potencias, de 1814 a 1919, que enlaza con artículos más detallados. Las relaciones internacionales de los países menores están incluidas en sus propios artículos de historia. Esta era abarca el período entre el final de las guerras napoleónicas y el Congreso de Viena (1814-15), al final de la Primera Guerra Mundial y la Conferencia de Paz de París.

Entre los temas importantes de la época están la rápida industrialización y el creciente poder del Reino Unido, Europa y más tarde, de los Estados Unidos, con Japón surgiendo como gran potencia e imperio al final de este período. Esto llevó a una competición imperialista y colonialista por la influencia y el poder por todo el mundo, cuyo impacto aún es amplio y con consecuencias que llegan a la época actual. El Reino Unido estableció una red económica informal que, combinada con la Royal Navy, hizo de ella la nación más influyente de la época. Hablando en términos generales, no hubo conflictos graves entre las grandes potencias, siendo la mayor parte de las guerras escaramuzas entre beligerantes dentro de las fronteras de países concretos. En Europa, las guerras fueron mucho más pequeñas, más cortas y menos frecuentes que nunca. Este siglo tranquilo se quebró al estallar la Primera guerra mundial (1914-18), que fue inesperada en cuanto a su momento, duración, bajas, e impacto a largo plazo.

8 0
3 years ago
Under the Abbasid dynasty, what kind of presence did the caliphs have?
never [62]
I think it would be ( They mainly stayed out of sight, but were in complete control of all matters big and small.) hope this helps.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is Akbar the Great significant?
cupoosta [38]

Akbar was accorded the epithet "the Great" because of his many accomplishments, including his record of unbeaten military campaigns that consolidated Mughal rule in the Indian subcontinent. The basis of this military prowess and authority was Akbar's skilful structural and organisational calibration of the Mughal army.

6 0
3 years ago
A exchange rate is used to
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

The exchange rate is the rate at which one currency can be traded for another between nations or economic zones.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1896, the US supreme court ruled in Plessy V. Ferguson. What was their decision?
    11·1 answer
  • Which description summarizes marco polo's description of beijing?
    7·1 answer
  • The Qin dynasty was divided into two periods because
    12·2 answers
  • What did bacon believe was the purpose of the scientific method
    11·1 answer
  • The idea behind the symbol of the yin and the yang was based on :
    6·1 answer
  • In the 2000 Bush v. Gore decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
    10·1 answer
  • The first new state to be established after the US declared independence was
    9·2 answers
  • What's a reason that a Soldier would go on the Silk Road in Ancient China?​
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement correctly uses a description of time?
    9·1 answer
  • Which three characteristics describe feudalism?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!