Answer:
C. seen as profiting from the misery of others
Explanation:
Answer:
The 95 Thesis Challenged the catholic church
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Since you have not given any choices, the best I can do is list what the fed would most likely do.
Their first step would be to lower interest rates. That would mean that consumers and corporations would pay out less in borrowing cost and free up money for them to spend in other ways. That is all that the fed should do. That is all they were, in the beginning, mandated to do.
Since the beginning, they have begun to become creative and have done all sorts of things to keep out of a recession. They've printed more money. Literally. They done this producing dollars that have no backing whatever. This action has created wealth for institutions like the banks and very wealthy wall street investors. It has done nothing for the middle class. Likely both your parents work. When I was raising my kids, it only required that I be out of the house. We lived comfortably on just 1 wage.
Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
