It depends on what type of disease it is, most people won’t believe you until you can scientifically prove you can
Answer:
under the tower the D one to the right
Answer:
ETHICS :
Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that "involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior".The field of ethics, along with aesthetics, concerns matters of value, and thus comprises the branch of philosophy called axiology.
Ethics seeks to resolve questions of human morality by defining concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime. As a field of intellectual inquiry, moral philosophy also is related to the fields of moral psychology, descriptive ethics, and value theory.
Three major areas of study within ethics recognized today are:
1. Meta-ethics, concerning the theoretical meaning and reference of moral propositions, and how their truth values (if any) can be determined
2. Normative ethics, concerning the practical means of determining a moral course of action
3. Applied ethics, concerning what a person is obligated (or permitted) to do in a specific situation or a particular domain of action.
MORALS :
A moral (from Latin morālis) is a message that is conveyed or a lesson to be learned from a story or event. The moral may be left to the hearer, reader, or viewer to determine for themselves, or may be explicitly encapsulated in a maxim. A moral is a lesson in a story or in real life.
The ability of older adults to adequately distribute drugs that are ingested is highly dependent on serum levels of Albumin.
<h3>What is Albumin? </h3>
Albumin is the most common factor protein present in the plasma, whose levels alter many physiological and chemical processes including drug medication dissolution properties.
In conclusion, the ability of older adults to adequately distribute drugs that are ingested is highly dependent on serum levels of Albumin.
Learn more about Albumin proteins here:
brainly.com/question/18521494
#SPJ1
Answer:
One of the conditions that she describe
was induced heart failure, which is basically a “broken heart.” She says that human doctors apparently discovered that this is true in humans around 2000. However, veterinarians had recognized this in the earlier 1970s. This just goes to show that there are more correlations between the two than people realize and could help substantially.
Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz's argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or
weak?
I think that her argument is extremely convincing and I definitely agree with her. Her statements about how she performed
the same functions on both humans and other animals helped portray the argument she was making but was also a strong point. I also thought that her naming the three
conditions was very strong
Explanation:
