We can actually deduce here that Wilderness was recognized as a moral and cultural resource and a basis for national self-esteem by the middle decades of the nineteenth century. This is actually true.
<h3>
What is Wilderness?</h3>
Wilderness was actually known to become America's distinction. It was at first, nature or a specific natural objects of nature.
We see here that in the nineteenth century, Wilderness was thought to be the mark of true nationhood. This is because it was recognized as a moral and cultural resource and a basis for national self-esteem by the middle decades of the nineteenth century.
Learn more about Wilderness on brainly.com/question/3956913
#SPJ1
Answer:
Colin is making a(n) external or situational attribution, whereas Jim is making a(n) internal or personal attribution.
Explanation:
In psychology, the attribution theory explains that people try to understand or make sense of a behavior or event by assigning causes to it. An external or situational attribution explains the cause for the event as a matter of luck, of interference by other people or the environment etc. In short, the behavior or event is caused by something external to itself. On the other hand, internal or personal attribution explains the cause as resulting from the involved person's personality, abilities, skills, mood, efforts, etc. That means the cause would be the very person, not something else. From those explanations, we can conclude Colin is making an external attribution - traffic is the cause - while Jim is making an internal attribution - the caterer is disorganized.
Answer:
It creates longer wait times for confirmation of executive appointments.
Explanation:
Making a decision after logically thinking about the choices should be correct :)
