Answer:
the were fighting in the trenches
Explanation:
<span>it weakened the soviet economy and encouraged mikhail gorbachev to promote reform in teh soviet union </span>
Based on the excerpt and the historical records, the native people, that is, <u>Cherokee Nation were forcefully removed from their ancestral land</u>.
<h3>Treaty of New Echota</h3>
The Treaty of New Echota was initially signed by the United States and some minority known as Treaty Party in the Cherokee Nation in 1835.
While most of the Cherokee Nation did not support and agree with the Treaty, the United States government forcefully removed the Cherokee Nation from their land, Southeast of Georgia to the West where the Native Indian lives.
The Cherokee Nation was later forcefully removed in what was known as the Trail of Tears between 1836 to 1839.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the Cherokee Nation were forced to move from present-day Georgia to present-day Oklahoma.
Learn more about Cherokee Nation here: brainly.com/question/2297390
Answer:
O. Periodic appointments would destroy a judge's independence.
Explanation:
Alexander Hamilton wrote in his "Federalist Papers No. 78" how the independence of judges is important for the security of everyone. Stating that <em>"the general liberty of the people can never be endangered .... so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive"</em>. He further went to demand that <em>"independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the Constitution and the rights of individuals"</em>. He believes that independence of the judiciary from either the legislative or executive is a much needed act, for it will ensure the right and correct implementation of judgement. He proposed that <em>"complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution"</em>.
Moreover, judges' permanent appointment will ensure the rightful passing of judgement which can be flawed if the judges are appointed periodically. For no two persons are the same, so this may lead to differences in opinions which will lead to the former judgement being recanted by the next person appointed. Thus, he opines that <em>"periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be fatal to their necessary independence"</em>.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.
Answer:
10
Explanation:
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 = 10
For example, you have 5 cookies, now you bake another 5 cookies. You now have 10 cookies.
~I hope I helped you! :)~
